...$500,000 a year; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures would apply. S. 2010 contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform...the budgets of state, local, or tribal governments. This legislation would impose private-sector mandates, as defined by UMRA, but CBO estimates that the...

...not affect direct spending or receipts; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures would not apply. HR 203 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates...the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) and would impose no significant costs on state, local, or tribal governments. Estimated cost to the Federal Government:...

...local, and tribal governments: S. 2010 contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in I JMRA and would not affect the budgets of state, local, or tribal governments. Estimated impact on the private sector: S. 2010 would impose private-sector mandates, as defined by UMRA, but...

...have a significant effect on spending subject to appropriation. HR 4518 contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform...the budgets of state, local, or tribal governments. HR 4518 would impose a private-sector mandate as defined in UMRA on satellite companies. CBO estimates...

...implementing HR 4586 would have no effect on Federal spending. HR 4586 contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform...the budgets of State, local, or tribal governments. HR 4586 would impose private-sector mandates as defined in UMRA. CBO estimates that the direct cost...

...impact on the federal budget. Enacting the bill would not affect direct spending or revenues. HR 4056 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. HR 4056 would encourage the Administration...

...or magnitude of any resulting change in direct spending. S. 1892 would not affect revenues. S. 1892 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. Enacting this legislation could benefit...

...spending). CBO estimates that any increase in criminal penalties would not be significant. The legislation contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates...the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) and would impost no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The...

...appropriation of the estimated amounts. Enacting the bill would not affect direct spending or receipts. S. 193 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would not affect the budgets of state, local, or tribal governments. ...

...significant effect on the federal budget and would not affect direct spending or revenues. HR 1675 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. The CBO staff contact for this estimate...