Equal Access to Justice Act Amendments: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 5059 ... March 14, 1984U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 - 413 pagini |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 6 - 10 din 78
Pagina 30
... allowing the court to look at the agency's underlying conduct would turn the statute into virtually an automatic fee - shifting device . For example , if a court has concluded that an agency action is ... allow the fee provision 30.
... allowing the court to look at the agency's underlying conduct would turn the statute into virtually an automatic fee - shifting device . For example , if a court has concluded that an agency action is ... allow the fee provision 30.
Pagina 31
... allow the fee provision to swallow up the system of controls established under the substantive statute . .3 . Standards for Land Condemnation Cases Whether land condemnation cases are covered by the Equal Access to Justice Act is ...
... allow the fee provision to swallow up the system of controls established under the substantive statute . .3 . Standards for Land Condemnation Cases Whether land condemnation cases are covered by the Equal Access to Justice Act is ...
Pagina 34
... . However , others may read language in the Act to mean that the adjudicative officer's deicision is final and that there can be no agency review . Because the Act allows only the party suing the government - 10 - 34.
... . However , others may read language in the Act to mean that the adjudicative officer's deicision is final and that there can be no agency review . Because the Act allows only the party suing the government - 10 - 34.
Pagina 35
... allows only the party suing the government to appeal an adjudicative officer's fee determination , this latter reading of the Act would mean that an agency would always be bound by an adjudicative officer's determination with regard to ...
... allows only the party suing the government to appeal an adjudicative officer's fee determination , this latter reading of the Act would mean that an agency would always be bound by an adjudicative officer's determination with regard to ...
Pagina 44
... allows this subcommittee an important opportunity to now take what has actually happened and , in the process of reauthorizing the bill , tie up any loose ends that you feel have developed . I would like to emphasize that I think it is ...
... allows this subcommittee an important opportunity to now take what has actually happened and , in the process of reauthorizing the bill , tie up any loose ends that you feel have developed . I would like to emphasize that I think it is ...
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Termeni și expresii frecvente
1984 amendment Access to Justice adjudicative officer administrative law judge administrative proceedings adversary adjudication agency adjudication agency's Alliance for Justice American Bar Association amount appropriate Aron attorney fees award of attorneys award of fees bill boards of contract Chairman civil action claimants Claims Court Committee Cong Congress contract appeals Contract Disputes Act costs Dan Rostenkowski decision denied Dept district court EAJA eligible enacted Equal Access expenses awarded fee applications fee awards fee determination fee-shifting statutes fees and expenses filed fiscal government's position hearings Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Service issue Judiciary Justice Act KASTENMEIER KUHL limited merits NLRB October payment pending petitions prevailing party private party procedures provides pursuant reasonable reauthorization represented Rule 68 Senate settlement Small Business Administration Social Security Administration standard Subcommittee on Courts subsection substantially justified Tax Court taxpayer TEFRA thereof the following tion title 28 United States Code unreasonable Washington worth
Pasaje populare
Pagina 130 - Changes in Existing Law Made bt the Bill, As Reported In compliance with clause 3 of Rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italic, existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman) : TITLE 38, UNITED STATES CODE PART I. GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1— GENERAL 101. Definitions For the purposes of this...
Pagina 117 - States; and (ii) attorney fees shall not be awarded in excess of $75 per hour unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee.); (B) "party...
Pagina 253 - United States, as sovereign, is immune from suit save as it consents to be sued . . . and the terms of its consent to be sued in any court define that court's jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
Pagina 133 - States fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort) brought by or against the United States in any court having jurisdiction of that action, unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.
Pagina 138 - The interest shall be computed at the rate of interest established by the Secretary of the Treasury, and published in the Federal Register, for interest payments under section 12 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 USC 611), which is in effect at the time the agency accrues the obligation to pay a late payment interest penalty.
Pagina 265 - That the Supreme Court of the United States shall have the power to prescribe, by general rules, for the district courts of the United States and for the courts of the District of Columbia, the forms of process, writs, pleadings, and motions, and the practice and procedure in civil actions at law.
Pagina 133 - Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a judgment for costs, as enumerated in section 1920 of this title but not including the fees and expenses of attorneys may be awarded to the prevailing party in any civil action brought by or against the United States or any agency or official of the United States acting in his official capacity, in any court having jurisdiction of such action.
Pagina 265 - shall be construed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.
Pagina 254 - The United States shall be liable for such fees and expenses to the same extent that any other party would be liable under the common law or under the terms of any statute which specifically provides for such an award.
Pagina 265 - Act provides the Supreme Court shall have the power "to prescribe by general rules, the forms of process, writs, pleadings and motions, and the practice and procedure of the district courts and courts of appeals of the United States in civil actions, including admiralty and maritime cases, and appeals therein, and the practice and procedure in proceedings for the review by the courts of appeals of decisions of the Tax Court of the United States and for the judicial review or enforcement of orders...