 The United States understands the phrase, 'where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture,' as used in Article 3 of the Convention, to mean 'if it is more likely than not that he would be tortured.  Congressional Serial Set - Pagina 141992Vizualizare completă - Despre această carte
 | 2000 - 1032 pagini
...follows: (1) No State party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. (2) For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities... | |
 | 1999 - 940 pagini
...follows: (1) No State party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. (2) For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities... | |
 | Louis B. Sohn - 1986 - 1118 pagini
...Article 3 1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. 2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities... | |
 | David A. Martin - 1988 - 244 pagini
...requires that "no State Party shall expel, return ('refouler') or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture." 33 The European Commission on Human Rights has already held that, in certain circumstances,... | |
 | David A. Martin - 1988 - 244 pagini
...provides that "no State Party shall expel, return ('refouler') or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture." Under this Convention, "[f]or the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds,... | |
 | J. Hermann Burgers - 1988 - 300 pagini
...(doe. E/CN.4/WG.1/WP.l): “No State Party shall expel, return (“refouler”) or extradite a person where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.” In its written comments, France proposed an alternative draft in which the following wording... | |
 | J. Hermann Burgers - 1988 - 300 pagini
...Article 3 1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. 2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities... | |
 | M. Hamalengwa, Cees Flinterman, E. V. O. Dankwa - 1988 - 450 pagini
...torture. Article 3 1. No State Party shall expel, return (refouler) or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. 2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities... | |
| |
