Book, 66; on reception by faith only,
88; on Bishop Cheney, 90; on the
language of Herbert, 167; on the
garbled quotation from Bramhall,
183; on the incomplete quotation
from Tillotson, 184; on the Twenty-
ninth Article, 192; on the author-
ship of the Diallacticon, 254.
Griffiths, his edition of the Homilies re-
ferred to, 28, note; prints, "Ghostly
sustenance," 97.

Grindal, Archbishop, on the manner of
reception, 142.

Hall's Harmony of Confessions, 118.
Hammond, Dr., teaches that the Body
of Christ is given by God, not by
man, 81; on corporal Presence, 117.
Hampden, Bishop, on Ratramn, 160.'
Harding, on corporal Presence, 117;
shows that the true natural Body of
Christ is a spiritual Body, 129; on
the worship of Christ in the elements,
243.

Hardwick's Articles, 17, 39, 77.
Herbert, George, quoted by the Judge,
167; the language quoted is either
figurative or blasphemous, ib.
Heresy, punishment of clerks for, 6.
Hey, Dr., on the Declaration on Kneel-
ing, 124; quoted by the Judge on
Real Presence, 178; denies the
corporal Presence, ib.; quoted by the
Judge on Article 29, 204; but does
not support him, ib.; on Sacrifice,
232, 235.

Historical examination of the Formu-
laries, 45.

Holy Mysteries, defined, 53: the term
used in the First Prayer Book, ib.;
modified or omitted in the Second
Prayer Book, 66.
Homilies, First Book of, published in
1547, 47; points of controversy
touched by it, ib.; advertisement at
end of the Book, 28; the unity and
perfection of Christ's Sacrifice de-
clared, 221.

Second Book of, uses the word
"Eucharistia,' 17, note; rejects the
formula "under the form," &c., 30,
35; teaches that the spiritual food
of the Eucharist must be sought in
heaven by minds lifted up, 83;
ordered to be read, 95; sermon on
the Sacrament, quoted by the Judge,
87, 97; teaches Incorporation of the
Body and Blood of Christ in the
soul, 96; speaks of no Presence in
the elements, ib.; teaches that the
faithless receive only the outward

Sacrament or figure, 97; reception
by faith alone, 98; shows the mean-
ing of "inward and "outward,"
102; proves real reception by the
faithful, 138; by lifting up our minds
by faith to heaven, 141; says nothing
of Presence in the elements, 164;
contrasts the faithful with the faith-
less, 206; declares the Holy Com-
munion to be a memory, not a sacri-
fice, 222.

Hook, Dean, his Life of Cranmer, 7;
on Real Presence, 12; Life of Ridley,
60;
Life of Whitgift, 72; Life of
Nowell, 92; on Thorndike's sus-
pected popery, 181; Life of Ken,
192; on Eucharistic Sacrifice, 230.
Hooker, Richard, on Real Presence,
11; on external Presence, 20; shows
the identity of the natural with the
true Body of Christ, 127; holds the
receptionist doctrine, 144; shows
the difference between natural Body
and natural Presence, 150.

Hooper, Bishop, his visitation articles,
64, 65, 220, 245; teaches that the
Body of Christ is given not by man,
but by the Holy Ghost, 82.
Hour of Sacrifice, 222.

Hymn from the Roman Missal, quoted
by the Judge, 196.

Incense is connected with Sacrifice,

209; symbolizes the propitiatory
character of the Sacrifice, 210.
In heaven and not here, unexpectedly
maintained by Cranmer and Ridley
in 1548, 61; the germ of the Second
Prayer Book, ib.; set forth in Cran-
mer's treatise of the Lord's Supper,
ib.
Innovations, avoided at the Reforma-
tion, 48; principle laid down in the

First Prayer Book, ib.; asserted by
Dr. Donne, ib.

Institution of a Christian man, 33, 45.
Interlocutory Order, appealed against, 3.
Inward and outward, apply in the

Catechism to the recipients, not to
the elements, 101; this use confirmed
by Article 25, 102; by the Homily,
ib.; by Jewel, ib.; and by Nowell, 103.

Jackson, Dean, teaches that Christ

Himself must give us His Body, 82;
quoted by the Judge, 172; does not
hold Mr. Bennett's doctrine, 173;
quoted by the Judge, 199.
Jacobson, Bishop, on Nowell's Cate-
chism, 94, 103.

Jenkyns' Life of Cranmer, 39. Jerusalem Bishopric Act, 38. Jewel, Bishop, on the Presence, 9; on "covered with the form," &c., 44; shows the meaning of "inward," 102; holds that the true natural Body of Christ is a spiritual Body, 129; that the Roman doctrine involves an imaginary Body yet more spiritual, 130; on manner of reception, 142; quoted by the Judge, 164; does not support Mr. Bennett's doctrine, 165; distinguishes propitiation from Sacrifice, 212; denies that man can offer Christ, 213.

John, St., chap. vi., cited by the Judge, 194.

Johnson's Canons, 6.

Judge, the learned, his decision on visible Presence, 4; and sentence, 5; decision on substitution, ib.; on the formula "under the form," &c., 33 seq., 251; on the Augsburg Confession, 38; on the Lutheran tendencies of Cranmer, 55 seq.; holds that the Second Prayer Book excluded the Real Presence, 67; comments on the alterations in Elizabeth's Prayer Book, 72; on Article 28, 83; on Article 26, 84; mistakes manner of giving, &c., for manner of Presence, 85; relies on Geste's letter, ib.; proposes to insert "beneficial,' 87, 89; has nowhere noticed Nowell's Catechism, 93; comments on the Homily, 95; proposes to insert "beneficial' in the Homily, 96; contrary to the argument of the Homily, ib.; comments on the Catechism, 99, 107; sanctions the real external Presence, 101; defines incorrectly corporal Presence," 118; discusses alteration in the Declaration, 119; denies equivalence of corporal and real and essential, ib.; holds the alteration material,

121;

66

the contrary proved, ib.; makes the Declaration unreasonable, 123; relies on the word "natural," 128; but that word has no special force, ib.; has omitted to define "Spiritual Body," 130; aud Spiritual Presence, 131; discusses the Receptionist Doctrine, 143; and the natural Body, 147; considers that a physical Presence is charged, 148; inexact regarding the Presence, 149; seems to support two manners of Presence, 150; quotes authorities on Real Presence, 158; decides that no mode of Presence is denied but Transubstantiation, ib.; holds the language of the Formularies to be indefinite,

271

159; quotes at great length Ratramu and Elfric, 160; and thirty other authorities, 163 seq.; omits important words in Ridley, 164; and in Jewel, 165; wrongly attributes "Additional Notes" to Bishop Overall,_166; gives a garbled quotation from Bramhall, 183; and from Tillotson, 185; discusses Article 29, 190; suggests theory of withdrawal, 191; quotes St. John, 194; says that the wicked do eat the Body of Christ, 196; cites a hymn from the Roman Missal, ib.; quotes authorities on the Twentyninth Article, 196-207; comments on the charges regarding Sacrifice, 208; upon the decisions on Sacrifice, 225; suggests their re-consideration, 226; says he is trying other Divines besides Mr. Bennett, 227; quotes seventeen authorities on Sacrifice, 232; but they do not support a real offering, 236; gives judgment on Sacrifice, ib.; makes no comment upon Mr. Bennett's assertion of real and living offering, 237; approves Mr. Bennett's teaching on Sacramental Adoration, 247, 251; has misapprehended the Issue, 252; cites authorities on adoration, 253; admits Lutherans as authorities in the Church of England, 258; his conclusions of fact inexact, 259; his conclusions of law indefinite, 261; has taken no notice of the main points in issue, 263.

Judicial Committee, members present, 1. Justus Jonas' Catechism, 32; corrected by Cranmer, 57.

Keble, Rev. John, edits Hooker's works

11; expresses no dissent from Hooker's doctrine of the Lord's Supper, 12; on Sacrifice, 226, 229, 232; on adoration, relied on by the Judge, 258.

Keble College, not founded by the University of Oxford, 260. Keeling's Liturg. Britan., 70. Ken, Bishop, quoted by the Judge, 175; shown by Archbishop Longley to have altered his language, ib.; relied on by the Judge, 191; but of no authority, 192. Killaloe, Bishop of, on the Catechism, 141.

Lamb, Dr., on the Thirty-nine Articles, 86. Lateran, 4th Council of, 27.

Latimer, Bishop, on the office of the
Mass, 217; on propitiation, 238.
Laud, Archbishop, quoted by the Judge,
167; not a reliable authority, ib.;
does not support, but condemns Mr.
Bennett's doctrine, 168.
Laurence, Archbishop, on Cranmer, 56.
Letter of Bishop Geste, relied upon by
the Judge, 85; decided to be no evi-
dence, 86.

Letter of St. Cyril to Nestorius, 173.
Letter, without signature, to Cecil, 90,
192.

Lifting up the mind by faith, necessary
for receiving the Body of Christ, 83;
so taught by Nowell's Catechism, 139;
by Cranmer, 140; by Homily, 141;
necessary for the adoration of Christ
as God and man, 249.
Liturgies, Ancient, contained no verbal
oblation of the Body of Christ, 216.
Liturgies of Edward VI.:

First Prayer Book, 48, 50, 52, 53,
63, 65, 217, 218, 219, 220, 244.
Second Prayer Book, 62, 67, 68.
Articles of 1552, 114.

Lloyd's Formularies of Faith, 34.
Local Presence, see Presence.

Local Sacrifice taught by Mr. Bennett,
242.

Local and Supra-local, 153.

Longley, Archbishop, on real Presence,

11; on the Receptionist Doctrine,
144; on Ken's alteration of his lan-
guage, 175; on the imaginative lan-
guage of Jeremy Taylor, 178; on
Sacrifice in the Eucharist, 241.
Lushington, Dr., on 29th Article, 90.
Lutheranæ Ecclesiæ Libri Symbolici,

79.
Lutheran Doctrine of local Presence,
14; of Consubstantiation, 25; of oral
reception, 79.

Lutheran opinions of Cranmer asserted

by the Judge, 55; on the authority
of Archbishop Laurence, 56; the con-
trary proved by Archbishop Lau-
rence, ib.; the Judge relies on the
Lutheran character of Justus Jonas'
Catechism, 57; but has overlooked
Cranmer's corrections, ib.; Lutheran-
ism abandoned by Cranmer and Rid-
ley, 61.

Lutheran Writers are not authorities in
the Church of England, 258.

Main Issues, the, 3.

Mandamus, rule for, made absolute, 8.
Manner of Presence not spoken of in
Article 28; but manner of giving,
taking, and eating, 78; given by God.

a spiritual manner of giving, 82;
given by the hand of the priest, a
corporal manner of giving, 83.
Manners of Presence, different, not re-
cognized by the Church of England,
75, 262.

Manual Acts omitted in the Second
Prayer Book, 64; restored in 1662,
109; omitted to prevent Sacrifice,
220; and to prevent adoration, 245.
Mary, Queen, accession of, 69.
Maskell's Edition of the Sarum Missal,
244 note.

Metaphorical sense of Sacrifice, 228;
excluded by Mr. Bennett, 238.
Missal, Roman, hymn from, 196.
Missal, Sarum, basis of the First Com-
munion office, 48; passages on ex-
ternal presence rejected, 49; did not
contain Transubstantiation, 50; con-
secration prayer very ancient, 51; the
Agnus Dei, 65; has a rubric on
Communion of the Sick, 171; con-
tained seven prayers, &c., forming the
Sacrifice of the Mass, 215; but no
express offering of the Body of Christ,
216; so witnesses against that inno-
vation, 217; commanded adoration
of the elements, 244.

Missal, Sarum, Church Press edition,
243, 244.

Missal, Sarum, Walker's edition, 49, 51,
65, 215.

66

Moberly, Bishop, on Hooker and Water-
land, 144; quoted by the Judge for
the objective Presence, 186; has
withdrawn the term 'objective,"
188; on Sacrifice, 226, 232.
Mode of Presence, a term unknown to
the Church, 262.

Morton, Bishop, teaches that Christ is
the Donor of His Body to the faithful,
82.

Mystical Body of Christ, see Body.

Natural Body of Christ, see Body.
Necessary Erudition of a Christian Man,
34, 45.

Nicholls' Commentary on the Book of
Common Prayer, 165.

Nicholson, Bishop, uses the phrase
"under the form of Bread and Wine,"
41; sense in which he uses it, ib.;
teaches that the Body of Christ is
given by God, 81.

Nowell's Catechism, a work of the
greatest importance, 92; sanctioned
by Convocation, ib.; not noticed by
the Judge, 93; declares the whole
doctrine of the Lord's Supper, ib.;
denies Real Presence in the elements,

ib.; and reception by the wicked, 94;
required by the Canons of 1603 to be
taught in all schools, ib.; considered
by that Convocation to teach the
same doctrine of the Lord's Supper
as the Prayer Book, 99; explains the
words "inward" and "outward," 103;
proves the consistency of the Decla-
ration with the Catechism, 138; by
the lifting up of the soul and heart
to heaven, 139; on Sacrifice, 222.

Objective Presence, see Presence.
Offering, Real, see Sacrifice.
Oldcastle, Sir John, 36.
Omission proves Prohibition, 48, 64,
189.

Omissions from Criminal Articles, 1.
Omissions from Sarum Missal, 49 seq.
Omnipresence of Christ by His Divine
Nature, 9.

Order of the Communion 1548, 47; in-
corporated into First Prayer Book,
53.

Original Letters, Parker Society, 61.
Ossory, Bishop of, on Keble's assent to
Hooker, 11.

Overall, Bishop, quoted by the Judge

as author of "Additional Notes,"
165; was not the author of those
notes, 166.

Oxford Calendar, 172.

Palmer's Origines Liturgica, 216.
Parker, Archbishop, assisted Whitgift
in his Answer, 72; presented Articles
to Convocation, 73; prepared and
settled Article 28, 86.

Partaking, substituted for Communion, /
76.

Participation distinguished from Com-
munication, 76.

Patrick, Bishop, on the Roman Missal,

52.

Pearson, Bishop, quoted by the Judge,
179; concludes nothing in support of
Mr. Bennett, ib.; quotes Gelasius,
Bishop of Rome, ib.

Perry, Rev. T. W., on the Primers, 31;
quotes Bishop Gauden, 113; main-
tains that "corporal" and "real and
essential" are exactly the same, 115.
Peter Martyr, on true and natural body,
127.

Philpot, Archdeacon, asserts a Real
Presence, 111.

Placcius on the Diallacticon, 254.
Posture at the Institution, 222.
Poynet, Bishop, quoted by the Judge
on Article 29, 203; on Adoration,

273

254; shown by Dean Goode not to
have been the author of the Dial-
lacticon, 255.

Prayer Book, First of Edward VI., 47;
excluded external Real Presence, 50,
54; its provisions evaded, 63; pre-
ferred by Cecil, 70; rejected the
Sacrifice of the Mass, 214; inserted
a protest against it before the Prayer
of Consecration, 217; forbade the
action of Sacrifice in elevation, 218;
substituted a Sacrificial commemora-
tion, ib.; rejected Sacramental adora-
tion, 244.

Second, of Edward VI., 54; the
causes which led to its publica-
tion, 62; evasion of the First Prayer
Book, 63; omitted Manual Acts, 64;
and the "Agnus Dei," 65; made the
prayers more fit, 66; by doctrinal
alterations, ib.; especially of the Con-
secration Prayer, 67; rejected all Pre-
sence in the elements, 68; preferred
by the Divines to the First Prayer
Book, 70; ultimately restored by
Elizabeth, ib.; with modifications but
without doctrinal change, 71; dealt
with the subject of Sacrifice, 219;
was chiefly due to the necessity of
dealing with that subject, ib.; placed
reception immediately after consecra-
tion, 220; excluded Sacramental
adoration, 245.

Presbyter, English, on the Eucharistic
Presence, 82.

Presence, Actual, in the elements is
corporal Presence, 120; is held by
Mr. Bennett, ib.; excluded by the
Declaration on Kneeling, 136; as-
serted by Mr. Bennett, 154, 157.

Corporal, defined, 24, 77, 116,121;
bore one uniform meaning in con-
troversy 116; distinct from Presence
after a corporal manner, 118; incor-
rectly explained by the Judge, ib.;
does not convey a gross meaning,

119.

External, defined, 19; term used
by Hooker, 21; taught in the Missal,
49; rejected by the First Prayer
Book, 50, 51; and by the Second
Prayer Book, 66, 68.

Internal, defined, 20.

gross or physical, 118, 122, 148,
247.

Local, held by Papists and Luth-
erans, 14; discussed, 153; proved to
be held by Mr. Bennett, 250.

Objective and Subjective, 18;
terms unknown to the Formularies,
ib.; objections to their use, 19; the
Bishop of Durham on their use, 21;

used by Dr. Moberly, 187; with-
drawn by him, 188.

Presence, of Christ, not in issue, 9; by
His Divine nature Christ is omni-
present, ib.

of the Body and Blood of Christ
alone in issue, 9.

Real, of the Body of Christ, 9;
charge confined to Presence in the
elements before reception, 10; such
Presence never held by any school
in the Reformed Church, ib.; the
term does not occur in the Formu-
laries, 11; lawful sense of, ib.; de-
pendent on consecration and worthy
reception, 13; in elements has only
two forms, 21; distinct from Tran-
substantiation, 37; Roman doctrine
of, identical with that of Mr. Bennett,
41; taught in the Missal, 49; re-
jected by the First Prayer Book, 50,
54; abandoned by Cramner in 1547,
59; in the elements rejected by the
Second Prayer Book, 68; and by the
Declaration on Kneeling, 69; denied
by Nowell, 94; expressed by various
and accumulated terms, 114; as by
Geste, ib.; by Cranmer, 115; Real
Presence of the Body of Christ to
our spirits is spiritual Presence, 120;
but in the elements is corporal Pre-
sence, 121; this is the "real and
essential Presence there being '
denied in 1552, 122; and now denied
as "corporal Presence," 123; Real
Presence as held by Mr. Bennett,
153; disproved by Article 29, 190;
is the ground of real offering, 230;
and of Sacramental adoration, 251.

66

Spiritual, spoken of by the Judge,
but not defined, 40, 131; spoken of
by the Bishop of Ely, 46; held by
Cranmer from 1549, 60; the phrase
defined, 130; means presence to
our spirits," 131; proved by Jeremy
Taylor, b.; does not mean, "pre-
sent after a spiritual manner," which
is Roman doctrine, 132; the Roman
doctrine involves two Bodies, ib.;
two natures, ib.; shown by Cranmer
to be a double heresy, 133; the Ro-
man doctrine held by Mr. Bennett,
134; would demand adoration, 247.

Visible, taught by Mr. Bennett,
4; condemned by the Judge, 4-6;
but held to be sufficiently retracted,
5; not abjured nor revoked, 9; in-
admissible even in the Church of
Rome, 9, note; may mean that Christ
is made visible by the bread and
wine, 154; argument of Archdeacon
Wilberforce, 153.

Primer of Henry VIII., 31; of Edward
VI., ib.; of Elizabeth, 31, 35; see
"Under the form," &c.

Private Prayers in reign of Elizabeth,
31.

Proceedings against Archdeacon Deni-
son, 90, 191.

Progress of Cranmer's opinions on the
Eucharist, 59; of Ridley's opinions, 60.
Propitiation, symbolized by incense,
210; defined by the 31st Article, 211;
attributed to the Sacrifice by the
Council of Trent, 212; follows from
the reality of the offering, 238; so
declared by Latimer, ib.; and by the
Council of Trent, ib.; attributed to
the Sacrifice of the Eucharist by Mr.
Bennett, ib.; condemned by Article
31, 239.

Propositions to be maintained, 10.
Protest in the First l'rayer Book against
the Sacrifice of the Mass, 218.
Protestants, Foreign, hold true recep-
tion, 106.

Pulling, Dr., examined the original of
Article 28, 86, note.

Pusey, Dr., suggested "under the form,"
&c., 25; distinguishes between Real
Presence and Transubstantiation, 37;
on Article 29, 195; on Sacrifice, 226;
condemned by the University of Ox-
ford, 227; agrees with the Council of
Trent, ib.

Ratramn, referred to by the Judge, 36,
38; long extracts given by the Judge,
160; how far adopted by Ridley, 161;
of no authority in the Church of
England, b.; on Sacrifice, 232.
Real Presence, see Presence.
Real offering, see Sacrifice.
Reality of the offering gives reality to
the character of the altar, and of the
priest, 240.

Reception by the wicked, charge re-
jected, 2; the doctrine excluded by
Nowell's Catechism, 94; by the
Homilies, 97; held by Rome and by
the Lutherans, 205; rejected by the
Church of England, ib.; see Article
29.

Receptionist Doctrine, discussed by the
Judge, 143; shown to be the exclu-
sive doctrine of the Church of Eng-
land, by Hooker, Waterland, Longley,
and Harold Browne, 144.
Refinements as to the manner of the
Presence excluded by the Declaration
on Kneeling, 10.

Reformation, the, endangered by Mr.
Bennett's doctrines, 264.