International Human Rights: Universalism Versus Relativism
Quid Pro Books, 2013
International Human Rights is a classic socio-legal study of the incompatibility and possible reconciliation of competing views of culture relativism and absolute fundamental human rights. It features prodigious research and insight that is much cited by academics and human rights lawyers and activists over two decades. Quality ebook edition features active Contents, linked notes, and proper presentation of text and charts. Are human rights universal? Universalists and cultural relativists have long been debating this question. In INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, Alison Dundes Renteln reconciles the two positions and argues that, within the vast array of cultural practices and values, it is possible to create structural equivalents to rights in all societies. She poses that empirical cross-cultural research can reveal universal human rights standards, then demonstrates it through an analysis of the concept of measured retribution. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS provides an unusual combination of abstract theory and empirical evidence. It will interest scholars and students in political science, sociology, anthropology, peace studies, cross-cultural research, and philosophy, as well as human rights activists.
Ce spun oamenii - Scrie o recenzie
Nu am găsit nicio recenzie în locurile obișnuite.
Relativism Revisited 61
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
accepted according Africa American analysis anthropology appears approach assert Association believe blood money called Charter civil claim Commission committed comparative concept of human conﬂict considered Covenant crime criticism cross-cultural cultural relativism death debate discussion drafting duty empirical equivalent ethical ethical relativism example existence fact feud follows freedom Herskovits human rights idea important individual institutions international human rights international law interpretation issue Journal justice killed lex talionis limit London means moral murderer natural normative objectivity Organization original Oxford particular person perspective Philosophy political position possible practice present principle principle of retribution problem proportionality protection provides Public punishment Quarterly question reason reciprocity reference relativists relativity requires responsibility retribution revenge Review rules Science social society standards theory tolerance traditions United Nations University Press values vengeance Western York