Imagini ale paginilor
PDF
ePub

Hardy Plants.

Gardener there

420

4-40

By Mr. William Duncan, | On a Method of obtaining new Kinds of Pots-
toes. By Solànum tuberosum
Description and Use of Bartlett's Cultivator.
By W. D.

Plan of a Flower-Garden, with a List of Plants
for one Year, by a young Lady. Communi-
cated by J. G.

[ocr errors]

423
On the Treatment of the American Shrubs in
the Pleasure-Gardens of Francis Canning,
Esq., Foxcote. By Mr. W. B. Rose, Gardener

: there

425

On raising Auriculas from Seed, and on a new
Description of Covering for an Auricula Stage.
By Mr. P. Cornfield, Florist, Northampton 426
On the Culture of the Rosa odorata, the Sweet
or Tea-scented Rose. By Mr. J. Elles, late of
Longleat Gardens
427
On flowering the Chrysanthemum indicum. By
A Constant Reader and Subscriber
428

Notice of a Plant of Misa paradisiaca (the

Plantain), which has flowered and ripened

Fruit in the Garden of John Milford, Esq.,

Conver, near Exeter. Abridged from Three

Communications by Mr. Henry Dalgleish,

Gardener to Mr. Milford, dated July 25., No.

vember 9., and December 23.

On the Culture of Seedling Ranunculuses.
the Rev. Joseph Tyso

Description of Mr. Groom's Tulip Bed.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

548

By J.
683
684

On the Genus A'ster. By T. Rivère, Esq.

[ocr errors]

52

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

REVIEWS.

[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

GARDENER'S MAGAZINE,

FEBRUARY, 1830.

PART I.

ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE.

ART. I. Notes and Reflections made during a Tour through Part of France and Germany, in the Autumn of the Year 1828. By the CONDUCTor.

(Continued from Vol. V. p. 649.)

PARIS, Sept. 6. 1828. We were in Paris and its neighbourhood till October 10., when we left that city for Germany; we returned on December 10., and remained till the middle of January, 1829. After some general remarks on the vicinity of Paris, as compared with the vicinity of London, we shall arrange our notes under the heads of Public Gardens; Royal Gardens; Commercial Gardens; Villa Gardens and Country Residences; Agricultural Establishments and Manufactories connected with Agriculture; Architectural Improvements; and Garden Societies, Institutions, and Literature.

The natural circumstances of the vale of London and the plain of Paris differ in various particulars. The surface of the country and the soil in the vicinity of Paris are more favourable to gardening than they are in the neighbourhood of London; but the climate and almost every other circumstance are less favourable. This is speaking of gardening as including all its branches, and with particular reference to landscape-gardening. The surface of the country in the neighbourhood of Paris is more irregular than that around London; and those irregularities have more character, because they are for the most part produced by masses more or less stony or rocky. The hills at Montmartre and Montmorency are less like heaps of alluvial soil or gravel than the hills at VOL. VI.

Highgate and Greenwich. The soil is more favourable around Paris, because it is every where calcareous, and on a dry bottom. The climate is better adapted for ripening fruits and blossoming fine flowers than that of London; but, from the heat and dryness of the air in summer, and the severity of the winter, greatly inferior to it in the production of culinary vegetables, and indeed in the growth of plants of nearly every kind throughout the whole year. It is particularly unfavourable to the culture of herbage grasses; and hence the difficulty, amounting almost to an impossibility, of producing close green turf. In respect to water, as far as landscapegardening is concerned, London and Paris may be considered on a par; for, though the Thames is broader than the Seine, the banks of the latter river are more varied in natural cha

racter than those of the Thames. With regard to culture, the climate of London renders watering comparatively unnecessary in the neighbourhood of Paris, the watering of crops in the open air is one of the principal summer labours of the gardener. The scenery around Paris has an advantage over that round London, in possessing a number of natural woods of considerable extent, and a greater proportion of open lands and waste, surrounded by high cultivation; round London very little of nature remains. Thus much as to the natural circumstances of the vicinity of Paris, compared with those of the vicinity of London.

In artificial circumstances the two districts are strikingly different. The vicinity of Paris is all nakedness and long lines; that of London all clothing and accumulations of houses and trees, with abrupt or circuitous lines. The approaches to Paris on every side are characterised by straight roads, straight rows of trees, straight avenues and alleys, and straight lines in almost every thing. The approaches to London are not characterised by lines; the roads, fences, trees, and alleys in woods, are irregular, and neither strikingly crooked or curved, nor always straight. In the neighbourhood of Paris every thing bears the marks of legislative influence: the dwellings of every village and every detached house are numbered; the city has a marked boundary, is only to be entered through certain public gates, and, on leaving it, you are at once in the country. Round London it is on every side difficult to say where the city ends and the country begins; the one passing insensibly into the other for miles of distance, and green fields, gardens, villas, streets, and churches blending together, till at last the traveller finds himself in the heart of the city. There is, unquestionably, much more of art round London than round Paris, because there is much more wealth:

« ÎnapoiContinuă »