TABLE OF CASES.* (Arranged Alphabetically.) COMMISSION LEAFLETS NOS. 47-53, INCLUSIVE. November, 1915 - May, 1916 PAGE Adams, Charles, In re Application to Build Exchange. Case No. 706 (Mo.).. 392 Aledo, Citizens of, v. Peoples Tel. Co. et al., In re Consolidation 571 1241 Almena Farmers Telephone Co. v. City Tel. Co., In re Physical 265 Amacoy Telephone Co., In re Rate Increase. U-471 (Wis.) . . . . . . American Steel Foundries v. Kinloch Tel. Co. et al., In re Relocation of Lines. Case No. 3938 (Ill.)... 460 358 Angius, Dan, In re Certificate of Exigency. Docket No. 289 (Ariz.). 1225 Arizona, California & Nevada Telephone Co., In re Purchase of 1228 Arizona Corporation Commission v. Miami Townsite Co., In re 1041 Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway, Thompson v., In re Juris- Astoria Telephone Exchange, In re Rate Increase. Case No. 4118 (III.). . . . Ashland Home Telephone Co. v. Ashland County, In re Rates. (Wis.). . . . 1086 1187 1060 760 788 165 Auxvasse Mutual Telephone Co. v. Buffum Tel. Co., In re Physical 1095 Avilla Mutual Telephone Co., In re Rate Increase. No. 1741 (Ind.) 821 *General orders, conference and administrative rulings are not included in this table but will be found in table on page xxix, under name of state by which issued. PAGE Bangor Telephone Co., In re Rate Increase. U-462 (Wis.). . 110 ...... 261 Bartlett & Ericson Telephone Co.: In re Discontinuance of Free Exchange of Service. Appl. No. 900 In re Rates for Short Term Service. Appl. No. 2631 (Neb.).. 1402 Beecher-Lisle Telephone Co., et al. v. New York Tel. Co., In re Rate Increase. Case No. 4824 (N. Y.)................. Bell Telephone Co. of Canada, In re Rates to Clergymen and ...... 646 1462 .117, 1013 1162 Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania, Norwich Tel. Co. v., In re Bills 430 968 Bethany Mutual Telephone Co., State (Ill.) Public Utilities Commission, ex rel. Macon County Tel. Co., In re Jurisdiction of Commission: Commission's Order Sustained by Supreme Court (Ill.) 350 Bethel Telephone & Telegraph Co., In re Stock Issue. No. 455 (Vt.) 1440 Billings Mutual Telephone Co. and Gore Bay Municipal Tel. System. In re Interchange of Service. P. F. 3127 (Canada).. Blue Hill Street Railway Co., In re Rate Increase. P. S. C. 886 (Mass.) Boone County Rural Telephone Co., In re Rate Increase. Case No. 3605 (Ill.). . 560 Boyceville Telephone Co., In re Proposed Extension into Occupied 449 Bradley, F. M. v. New York Tel. Co., In re Rates and Service. Case 397 Bradley Beach, Borough of, In re Separate Listing in Directories (N. J.).. ... 1416 Brush Creek Farmers Telephone Co., In re Certificate of Exigency. 1006 Buffum Telephone Co., Auxvasse Mutual Tel. Co. v., In re Physical 1095 Bureau County Independent Telephone Co., Hart v., In re Extension. Case No. 4199 (Ill.). . . . . 1073 Burlington Traction Co., Western Union Tel. Co. v., In re Electrical 1177 Butler, Borough of, In re Application for Approval of Ordinance (N. J.). . PAGE 492 Butler, E. O. v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway., 1129 381 Camden Rural Telephone Co. et al. v. Michigan State Tel. Co., In re Central Illinois Light Co., In re Prevention of Electrical Interference. Case No. 4268 (Ill.)..... 1028 Central Union Telephone Co. and Highland Tel. Co., In re Elimina- 796 Central Union Telephone Co. and Kewanee Home Tel. Co., In re 1154 779 1260 Chadron Telephone Co., In re Rates. Appl. No. 2512 (Neb.)...... 191 Chaney, James M. v. Pioneer Tel. & Tel. Co., In re Service to Subscriber Connected with Toll Line. Order No. 1009 (Okla.)..... 947 Chesaning Home Telephone Co., In re Physical Connection. T-99 (Mich.)... 1083 Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Baltimore City, In re ..... Chesterfield Telephone & Telegraph Co., In re Change in Rates. 656 1246 148 .. 1055 Chicago Telephone Co., Wells v., In re Refund of Reinstatement Chippewa County Telephone Co. et al., Edminster & Co., v., In re 363 990 437 In re 399 Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co. et al., Shafor v., Heat & Power Co., In re Certificate of Exigency. No. 138 (Pa.) 1037 Citizens Mutual Telephone Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co., In re Installation of Telephone in Railroad Station. Case No. 781 (Mo.). .. .. Citizens Mutual Telephone Co. v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co., In re Installation of Telephone in Railroad Station. Case No. 782 (Mo.). Citizens New Telephone Co., In re Rate Increase. No. 1759 (Ind.) Citizens Telephone Co. et al., In re Physical Connection. U-494 (Wis.). . . Citizens Telephone Co. et al.: PAGE 869 869 612 972 In re Rate Increase at Caledonia. T-93 (Mich.).... 855 853 855 .. 855 373 City Telephone Co., Almena Farmers Tel. Co. v., In re Physical 265 Clayton Telephone Co., Stout v., In re Elimination of Discriminatory Rates. No. 1320 (Ind.). 824 Cloverdale Telephone Co., In re Rate Increase. No. 1343 (Ind.)... Conde Telephone Co., Dakota Central Tel. Co. v., In re Rates. . 1170 Corona v. Corona Home Tel. Co. et al., In re Investigation of Rates, 507 202 Creswell Telephone Co., In re Rate Increase. U-F-141 (Ore.).... 424 Crownover Telephone Co., In re Installation Charge. Appl. No. 2574 (Neb.) .... Cuba City Telephone Co., In re Rate Increase. U-463 (Wis.)..... 897 114 863 235 In re Investigation of Facilities and Service. F-201 (S. D.).. 1163 Dakota Central Telephone Co. et al.: In re Filing of Contracts. F-225 (S. D.)..... Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. Conde Tel. Co., In re Rates. F-219 Dakota Central Telephone Co., Henry Union Tel. Co. v., In re PAGE 1170 247 Dakota Central Telephone Co. et al., Milbank v., In re Physical Dane County Rural Telephone Co.: 653 226 In re Extension into Occupied Territory. U-483 (Wis.)...... 657 In re Extension into Occupied Territory. U-506 (Wis.)...... 1010 Daniels Telephone Co. of Iuka, In re Certificate of Exigency. Case No. 3980 (Ill.) . . . 18 Darlington Telephone Co., In re Discrimination in Favor of Sub- 810 878 De Bower, E. F. v. Lodi Tel. Exchange, et al., In re Physical Connection. U-498 (Wis.).. 986 Delaware & Atlantic Telegraph & Telephone Co., In re Approval of Ordinance (N. J.). 193 Delaware & Atlantic Telegraph & Telephone Co., Eastern Tel. & Tel. Co. and Camden & Atlantic Tel. Co., In re Physical Connection (N. J.)................... 1129 Dell Cooperative Telephone Co. v. La Farge Tel. Co., In re Physical 473 Donaldson Telephone Co., Whitesell v., In re Inadequate Service. 610 Downsville Telephone Co., In re Extension into Occupied Territory. 1459 .... Dukes Prairie Telephone Co. et al., Mineral Point Tel. Co. v., Eastern Telephone & Telegraph Co., Camden & Atlantic Tel. Co. and Delaware & Atlantic Tel. & Tel. Co., In re Physical Connection (N. J.) 1129 Eastern Wisconsin Telephone Co., In re Rate Increase. U-500 (Wis.).. 995 Eckerty, Branchville & Cannelton Telephone Co., In re Extension into Occupied Territory. No. 727 (Ind.).. 375 Edminster & Co. v. Chippewa County Tel. Co. et al., In re Physical 990 |