Imagini ale paginilor
PDF
ePub

Messengers flying at midnight, and lights in the windows; Also the woe of the morning, the calm, restful Sabbath, Bringing no news of the young men, the pride of their households.

Thus as they talked, the lost one came softly upon them, Cast himself down in the midst between comrade and comrade,

Spake not, but lay gazing wearily into the firelight.
Slow sank the blaze into embers, and then into ashes,

Ere they began to talk soberly one to another.

66

Nay, I could scarce steer aright in this all-wrapping darkness,"

Said he who lay in the midst (for the bridged boats were his);

"Besides, I am bitterly tired, and fainting with hunger." Even as he spoke, from the toll-house a glimmer of lamplight

Fell on the shore, and as suddenly vanished in darkness, "Yonder is food!" cried Luke Gleason, the eldest, upstart. ing;

"Why should we famish, with farmer's good larder so near us ?'

[blocks in formation]

Sternly the old man looked on them, nor deigned to make answer;

Grave was he always, and slow of address to a stranger.
But from the brightness behind him, ablush with compassion,
Glided a beautiful girl to the side of her father,

Laid her soft hand on his sleeve with significant pressure. Meanwhile she modestly spake to the young men before her:

"Come in, and sit by the hearth-fire; our father is willing,
For an abundance of food yet remains from the supper."
Then with her hand still caressing the arm of her father
Led she him back to his seat in the cosiest corner;
Afterward seated the strangers beside the warm fireplace,
Blushed at their thanks, and hastened away to the kitchen.
Meanwhile the children drew round, flocking out of the
shadows;

Beautiful children they were, and of lineage taintless.

Dark, princely boys, like young noblemen playing the peasant.

Now the door opens, and Lora, the eldest and fairest,
Enters and stands with the children. How charming her

picture,

In the dim light, half-surrounded by gipsy-brown faces! "Supper is ready," she said, in a voice soft and modest; "Follow me, please." The young men rose up, then, and followed

Her eagerly into the low, dusky space of the kitchen.
There were huge dishes that steamed with a wholesome
provision;

Over the table their cloud and aroma were floating,
Sweeter than spice-laden breezes, or breath of deep gardens,
Unto the sportsmen.
They, when they had taken their
places,

Spake not a word, nor looked up, but ate deeply, in silence, As on a slope fresh and fragrant, and kissed by the morning,

Browses an ox, with his dew-dripping face in the clover!
Lora remained in the room, at a distance, to serve them,
If they should need aught replenished. Her mother, more
timid,

Glided away, and returned to her husband and children.
Still as a star from ten myriad falling, she vanished,
Light as a leaf that steals down through the boughs of an
oak-tree.

Soon as their hunger and thirst were appeased by the good things,

Frequently from the young men to the maid in the shadow Slipped the still arrows, the glances of mute admiration. Especially earnest the gaze of the handsome Luke Gleason, As, leaning his arm on the table, in seeming abstraction, Through his white fingers he peered at the toll-keeper's daughter,

Marveling much at the billowy poise of her shoulders; Her neck, round and ripe, and half-hid in her clustering tresses;

Her face, like an oval drop pressed from the cheek of a peach!

"Face of a fable!" he murmured-"'twill fade with disclosure.

I see it through dusk-light and fancy, and bathe it with glamor."

Then, hastily rising, the maiden stepped out of the shadow. "If you need nothing," she faltered, with down-drooping eyelids,

"I will return to my mother, and unto the children." Slowly she entered the doorway, still waiting before them, If they, perchance, should recall her for some service lacking.

But they spake not, and the maiden went gracefully from them,

Pure blood of France coursed their veins like a river of Raising her eyes, as she vanished, and meeting Luke sunshine: Gleason's:

Liquid-eyed girls, with cheeks red as the grass-hidden Up to her lids surged the blushes, and Gleason perceived berry; them!

Midnight had passed, and the south wind was steadily blowing

Over Colchester Reef, and straight from the light-house.
Nevertheless, in the eye of the glimmering beacon
Bounded the catamaran, from black billow to billow.
Cheerfully chatted the comrades, and, nestling together
Under the sail, they kept watch of the stars of the water,—
Bright beacon-lights on the points and the islands around
them.

"We shall be home ere the dawn breaks!" cried he who was steering.

"Never so staunchly my lady dashed over the billows: See how the lights on Isle Grand kiss the rim of the water!" Thereupon rose on his elbow Luke Gleason, and leeward Gazed with intentness. But now there were stars in the offing, And the window of Lora, perchance, was a window of heaven! (To be continued.)

TENNYSON'S POEMS.

Of the vast amount written on Mr. Tennyson's poetry, but a small portion has been devoted to serious analytical criticism. Professor Wilson's attack ("Blackwood's Magazine," vol. xxxi.), full of the boisterous spirits of the writer, was too obviously unfair to be taken as a true opinion, though there was in it much of real and discerning literary insight. Lord Houghton's article in the "Westminster Review," vol. xxxviii., able and admirably written, was yet too much in the tone of a discoverer of unknown lands, who thinks all is magnificently fair which strikes upon him with a sense of newness. This, together with Mr. George Brimley's paper, republished in his collected essays, and an article in the "London Review," vol. i., 1835, are perhaps the only sustained attempts to deal with the real intellectual phenomena presented by Mr. Tennyson's works.

But these all date from a period far away from modern readers, and reviewers have for many years gazed on the poems as men gazed on the sun before spectrum analysis. Able and enthusiastic eulogies have been written from time to time in all the leading periodicals as new works have appeared; here and there attempts have been made to discover esoteric meanings in plain and simple narrative of old chivalric tales; but little has been done to understand them as they are, and explain them, to show their relation to literature, to art, to nature, or to life, to estimate the kind and causes of their beauties or defects. Reviews have been for the most part one chorus of indiscriminate praise. There was a period when the Times would at least always essay, if it did not compass literary criticism, but the notices of Mr. Tennyson's recent poems have been almost comic in their abnegation of all a critic's functions. That, for instance, on "The Lover's Tale," simply

quoted as specimens one hundred and thirty-three lines of the poem, together with the larger portion of the little preface, and the remainder of the notice was simply an expansion of the following thoughts, if thoughts they can be called: "Piracy would be popular, if, as was in this instance the case, piracy often enforced publication. This is a remarkable poem for a boy of nineteen, but the essential characteristics of the boy's style are those of the man's." The greater part of other recent reviews have been of the same kind, extracts and platitudes, extracts for the sake of extracting, not as exemplifying a statement or enforcing a posi tion, platitudes in place of thought to save readers the trouble. of thinking, of which, to do them justice, they are rarely desirous. This action of the critics in the case of the later poems has only accentuated a conviction long growing in our mind, that criticism of Tennyson was needed and in some respects almost untried, and in the following pages we shall endeavor to supply the want.

Since the greater portion of this article was written, now more than a year since, two papers have appeared in the "Cornhill" annotating Mr. Tennyson as carefully as critic ever edited Greek play, and working out in detail a good deal of what is here sketched. It has not seemed to us, however, that our own broader examination of principles with but few details is surperseded by those excellent studies, to which we would refer all those who wish to verify our own conclusions more fully than our space will allow us.

We need not pause to prove the popularity of the works in question. Of course, there have been larger sales of single poems. No such rush for copies has ever taken place in Tennyson's case as in that of Byron or Scott, even when by publish

ing a ballad in a magazine a cheap form was adopted which placed the poem within the reach of all. Perhaps, too, in one given year, now some time ago, the works of Martin Farquhar Tupper, D.C.L., may have sold a more considerable number of copies than were sold in the same year of Tennyson, but if so the balance was soon redressed. Even evangelical doctrine could not make Tupper's work seem poetry for more than a brief season, and the Laureate's poems have reached quarters where Byron never and Scott seldom came. We do not doubt that at this moment in England more poetry of Tennyson is known by heart, and more could be quoted, than of all the other poets in the language fused into

one.

difficulty of allusion or quotation there is little difficulty of idea, and none, or almonst none, of diction. The words, and this is no light praise, follow each other in their natural prose sequence; there is no effort or straining after metre or rhyme; the words are the best suited to express the meaning whether considered as poetry or as prose.

We open the volume at hand absolutely at random and read:

"Lying, robed in snowy white

That loosely flew to left and right--
The leaves upon her falling light—
Through the noises of the night

She floated down to Camelot :
And as the boat-head wound along
The willowy hills and fields among
They heard her singing her last song,
The Lady of Shalott."

Now, if dismissing for a moment all sense of the assonance of rhyme, we would write this into prose, we shall find that only two changes are possible; we should read "flew loosely” instead of "loosely flew," and place the word "among" at the beginning instead of the end of the line.

Some of the causes of this popularity are trivial, yet worth a moment's notice. In the first place, Tennyson is thoroughly easy. The great poets who present the most difficulty are loved by their students with a passion often in proportion to the difficulty with which they are approached, and those students can never for a moment believe that the more popular poet is worthy to stand beside their own chosen one. Eschylus and Euripides, Dante and Tasso, Wordsworth and Scott, Browning and Tennyson, are instances of the Again, opening the volume equally at random, contrast we mean; the first of each pair is incom- we find the arras on the walls of the chambers in parably the higher poet, but the multitude who │"The Palace of Art" showed, one, read for relaxation and not for study, for facile delight and not for wise counsel, for titillation of fancy, and not for the calm satisfaction of intellect, will never believe it, nor are they able to understand or apprehend it.

When we say that Tennyson is easy we do not mean that there are not here and there passages requiring explanation, and which if an annotated edition were ever published would lead to controversy. The unfoldings of a mind so stored with literature and science will always present difficulties to those who are less educated than the writer. So long as "In Memoriam" is read people will ask, Who "sings to one' clear harp in divers tones, that men may rise on steppingstones of their dead selves to higher things"? What is the meaning of "Before the crimsoncircled star had fallen into her father's grave'? So long as they read the early poems, and have not read Dante, they will fail to understand the words in "The Vision of Sin," "God made himself an awful rose of dawn." But beyond the

66

"the reapers at their sultry toil.

In front they bound the sheaves. Behind
Were realms of upland, prodigal in oil,
And hoary to the wind.

And one a foreground black with stones and slags,
Beyond, a line of heights, and higher

All barred with long white cloud the scornful crags,
And highest, snow and fire.

And one, an English home- gray twilight poured
On dewy pastures, dewy trees,

Softer than sleep-all things in order stored,
A haunt of ancient peace."

In this passage the only words which could be transposed are the third line of the second stanza, which might in prose read better, "the scornful crags all barred with long white cloud," which, if the rhyme be of no importance, is an equally good line. Now take a passage in "Ulysses," where the question is in no degree complicated by assonance, and we find that no change at all is needed:

"You and I are old;

Old age hath yet his honor and his toil;

Death closes all: but something ere the end,
Some work of noble note, may yet be done,
Not unbecoming men that strove with gods.
The lights begin to twinkle from the rocks:

The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep
Moans round with many voices. Come, my friends,
'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
Push off, and sitting well in order smite
The sounding furrows; for my purpose holds
To sail beyond the sunset, and the baths
Of all the western stars, until I die."

If the same test be applied to the works of almost any other poet, we shall find a very different result. Take Mr. Browning in a passage also chosen by the simple test of opening the volume chosen by the simple test of opening the volume anywhere:

"Fear death ?-to feel the fog in my throat,

The mist in my face,

When the snows begin, and the blasts denote
I am nearing the place,

The power of the night, the press of the storm,
The post of the foe;

Where he stands, the Arch Fear in a visible form,
Yet the strong man must go;

For the journey is done and the summit attained,
And the barriers fall,

Though a battle's to fight ere the guerdon be gained,
The reward of it all."

To put this highly elliptical passage into prose would need no mere transposition of words, but a paraphrase; it requires and repays study, but the students are to the readers of poetry, as, perhaps,

one in a hundred.

The only other passage we will here quote shall be Mr. Matthew Arnold's finest sonnet, which

better than any other will exemplify the difference between the poet who writes for scholars only, and him who, indeed, delights scholars, but can be understood at a glance by all:

"So far as I concieve the world's rebuke

To him addressed, who would recast her new,
Not from herself her fame of strength she took,
But from his weakness, who would work her rue.
'Behold!' she cries, so many rages lulled,
So many fiery efforts quite cooled down!
Look, how so many spirits, long undulled,
After short commerce with me, fear my frown!
Thou, too, when thou against my crimes would cry,
Let thy foreboded homage check thy tongue!'
The world speaks well: yet might her foe reply,
'Are wills so weak? Then let not mine wait long.
Hast thou so rare a poison? Let me be
Keener to slay thee, lest thou poison me!'"
VOL. XVI.-8.

We have taken modern poets only for purpose of comparison, and but a few instances; but the test is one easily applied, and in most cases will be applied with the same result.

Another great reason of Tennyson's popularity is the homely, we may even say commonplace, character of his subjects, within the comprehension of all. They rarely quicken the pulses or stimulate the brain, and therefore suit the average English mind. De Musset's "On ne badine pas avec l'amour' will always find more readers than Victor Hugo's "Marion Delorme, "Romeo and Juliet" than "King Lear." However pathetic are de Musset's play and the graceful tragedy of Shakspere's youth, they do not stir the deep of human souls, or open the pit of fiery hell which lies deep in the central heart of each great nature, as in the heart of our mother, the earth. Take the whole of Tennyson's poems in the earlier volumes, and save, perhaps, "Fatima," and "The Sisters," there are no poems which deal with any violent or disturbing manifestation of passion. The wail of Enone and the plaint of Iphigenia are as decorous as if sobbed out in a Belgravian drawing-room, while they are studiously draped and surrounded so as to remind us of nothing in common with ourselves. It is quite otherwise with Shakspere's grand anachronisms, in which his men and women are not of any age, but of all time. And in those poems which seem exceptional

Fatima's" sensations have in them no mind; they are wholly physical and animal. The same criticism will apply to "Lucretius;" the physical troubles of lust, not the noble sufferings of love wronged or unrequited, are the subject of the times I stabbed him through and through" is poem. In "The Sisters" the tragedy of "three stilled into peace by the lines:

"I curled and combed his comely head,
He looked so grand when he was dead,"

quite another treatment and in quite another spirit to that in which Keats's "Isabella" dealt with her terrible treasure in the pot of basil.

Nor when Mr. Tennyson would "tell a tale of chivalry" do his notes ring like those of trumpets. to set the blood dancing in the veins. He does not seem to get beyond the plume and the glancing of the spear-heads. He speaks of battle, but "all the war is rolled in smoke," and we see nothing; his combats are as unreal in the "Idylls

of the King" as they are in "The Princess,"
when the poor little prince, exerting all his force,
felt his veins

"Stretch with fierce heat, a moment hand to hand,
And horse to horse, and sword to sword we hung,
Till I struck out and shouted; the blade glanced,
I did but shear a feather."

Just so, and the Lancelots and Arthurs, though we are told they were wounded, and groaned, and swooned, or mowed their enemies before them, still leave on us the impression that they were but shearing feathers; it is all like a pageant of battle on the stage; there are sparks in plenty flashing from the swords; the combatants tumble about, and we sit unmoved, knowing it all unreal.

pointed out by many critics, that "Halbert and Hob" is the expansion of a few lines in Aristotle's "Ethics," and the first incident of "Ivan Ivanovitch" is a story told wherever Russian life and Russian wolves are named. The true artist has seized the principle only of Aristotle's story, and given it a special English and Puritan interest, while in the sequel to the poor mother's tale he rises to the rank of the creator, the original poetic genius. But the restraint which Mr. Tennyson has laid on himself is different both in kind and in degree. In very many instances he has not taken an incident and expanded it, but taken the incident already described and expanded to its fullest extent, and by a touch here and there has transmuted the whole into a living poem. So an artist hand will arrange the mass of flowers and green foliage which the gardener brings from conservatory or parterre into the perfect bouquet for bridal or for ball.

A third cause of Mr. Tennyson's popularity is his freedom from coarse expressions; it is much to have an author as decorous as Cowper or Keble, while far more varied. There is scarce a word in all his writings at which the most fastidious can take exception. And the ordinary reader cares How largely this has been done in the case of about words. It is true that the things are not the "Idylls of the King" is of course known to always as harmless. Fatima, Lucretius, Merlin, all, yet a few familiar passages will best exhibt and Vivien are not good reading for girls, neither Mr. Tennyson's peculiar mode of working. Our is the confusion in "Queen Mary" between dropsy first instance shall be from "Gareth and Lynette," and pregnancy; but they are not understood by and the text so fairly embroidered by him is from the majority, and, taken all together, the poems" Popular Romances of the Middle Ages," in are good and wholesome reading, from which we which many of the old stories can be consulted can only rise pleased and improved.

Within the limits of his power Mr. Tennyson's workmanship is perfect, and in the long run good work is sure to tell. We shall now examine the limits and the workmanship, having enumerated the main causes of the popularity of these poems: their easiness, homeliness, decency of diction, and excellence of work.

most conveniently.

"King Arthur was holding high festival when there came into the hall two men on whose shoulders there leaned the fairest and goodliest youth that ever man saw, as though of himself he could not walk. When they reached the dais, the youth prayed God to bless the king and all his fair fellowship of the Round Table. And now I When we consider the limits within which Mr. pray thee, grant me three gifts, which I seek not Tennyson restricts himself, we are inclined to against reason: the one of these I will ask thee think that few save careful students are aware how now, and the other two when twelve months have very considerable a portion of his poems is delib- come round.' 'Ask,' said Arthur, and ye shall erate rendering into pure melodious verse what have your asking.' 'Then,' answered the youth, has already existed in another form. All poets of 'I will that ye give me meat and drink for a year.' course avail themselves of the heritage of the past, And though the king bade him ask something and there are few poems of any length which do better, yet would he not: and Arthur said, 'Meat not owe their origin to some story, event, or and drink enough shalt thou have; for that I other circumstance outside of their author's brain. never stinted to friend or foe. But what is thy Not to dwell on Shakspere's work and that of name?' That I cannot tell,' said the youth. other dramatists or playwrights, and on story- 'Strange,' said the king, 'that thou shouldest not tellers, as Boccaccio and Bandello, we may in- know thy name, and thou the goodliest youth that stance the use of older material by Mr. Brown-ever mine eyes have seen.' Then the king gave ing in his "Dramatic Idylls." It was at once him in charge to Sir Kay, who scorned him

« ÎnapoiContinuă »