To Exempt from the Quota Husbands of American Citizen Wives and to Limit the Presumption that Certain Alien Relatives May Become Public Charges: Hearings Before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, House of Representatives, Seventy-second Congress, First Session, on H.R. 5869, H.R. 7614, S. 2656

Coperta unu

Din interiorul cărții

Ce spun oamenii - Scrieți o recenzie

Nu am găsit nicio recenzie în locurile obișnuite.

Pagini selectate

Termeni și expresii frecvente

Pasaje populare

Pagina 16 - When used in this chapter the term "nonquota immigrant" means — (a) An immigrant who is the unmarried child under twenty-one years of age, or the wife, or the husband of a citizen of the United States : Provided, That the marriage shall have occurred prior to issuance of visa and, in the case of husbands of citizens, prior to July 1, 1932.
Pagina 29 - When used in this act the term "non-quota immigrant" means — (a) An immigrant who is the unmarried child under twentyone years of age, or the wife of a citizen of the United States, or the husband of a citizen of the United States by a marriage occurring prior to June 1, 1928...
Pagina 70 - Hearings before the House Committee on Immigration and Naturalization. To Exempt from the Quota Husbands of American Citizen Wives and to Limit the Presumption That Certain Alien Relatives May Become Public Charges.
Pagina 35 - Will you give your full name to the reporter, for the record ? Mr.
Pagina 29 - ... of such nationality who are the unmarried children under 21 years of age, or the wives, of alien residents of the United States who were lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence.
Pagina 47 - There is a lecord here that shows that of the (4,059.96 of her savings, $2,300 according to her own statement, represents presents from parents, not her own earnings Mrs. NTCLICH. I beg your pardon. The CHAIRMAN. Now, just a minute. How much of the $2,300 represents presents? There is $2,300. Mrs. NYCLICH. I beg your pardon. There was only $1,000 that I received as a present; and when I was investigated by the department I signed that same statement that I sent to my husband before, and he just simply...
Pagina 2 - ... unnecessary. We are referred to a decision of the District Court for the Southern District of New York in United States ex rel. Freeman v. Williams (DC) 175 Fed. 274, in which the deportation of an alien whose career before entering the United States had been one of habitual delinquency was sustained on the ground that he was likely to become a public charge. We are not persuaded by this decision, and think Savitsky did not fall within the class under which the order of deportation was made....
Pagina 21 - Congress, disturbed by reported abuses, opined that in 1917 if "a man had $25 or $50 in his pocket and a good pair of eyes and a good heart, he was not a public charge.
Pagina 5 - The CHAIRMAN. You are a citizen of the United States, are you? Mr.
Pagina 44 - As soon as he saw that document he immediately changed, and he told me that he did not have anything to do with it but that the jefe politico was in charge.

Informații bibliografice