A Comparative Analysis of Juvenile Codes |
Ce spun oamenii - Scrie o recenzie
Nu am găsit nicio recenzie în locurile obișnuite.
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Termeni și expresii frecvente
Absolute prohibition abused adult Alabama alleged alternatives American Samoa Apprehension Arizona Arkansas authority California charged child children in need Colorado committed Connecticut court order crime criminal court custody dangerous decision definitions Delaware delinquents dependent detention facilities disposition District of Columbia example filed Florida Georgia groups Guam Hampshire Hawaii hearing held Idaho Illinois Indiana indicates institution Iowa jail Jersey jurisdiction juvenile codes juvenile court Kansas Kentucky limitation Louisiana Maine Maryland maximum age Mexico Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Montana Nebraska need of supervision neglected juveniles North Carolina North Dakota Offense officer Ohio Oklahoma Oregon otherwise parents Pennsylvania petition placed placement protection Provision secure separate separate sections separation is required shelter South specific Standard Stat status offenses Table Tennessee term Texas transfer treatment Trust Territories unless Vermont Virgin Islands waiver Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Yes Yes Yes York youth
Pasaje populare
Pagina 77 - Offender — a juvenile who has been charged with or adjudicated for conduct which would not. under the law of the jurisdiction in which the offense was committed, be a crime if committed by an adult.
Pagina 73 - A child shall not be committed or transferred to a penal institution or other facility used primarily for the execution of sentences of persons convicted of a crime.
Pagina 9 - The seriousness of the alleged offense to the community and whether the protection of the community requires waiver. 2. Whether the alleged offense was committed in an aggressive, violent, premeditated or willful manner. 3. Whether the alleged offense was against persons or against property, greater weight being given to offenses against persons especially if personal injury resulted. 4. The prosecutive merit of the complaint, ie, whether there is evidence upon which a Grand Jury may be expected...
Pagina 26 - Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Federal districts Wyoming Source: "Upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction statutes analysis,
Pagina 35 - Mississippi. Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada. New Hampshire. New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania. South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Pagina 11 - ... 39.06(7) unless and until an indictment on such charge is returned by the grand jury, in which event and at which time the court shall be divested of jurisdiction under this statute and the charge shall be made and the child shall be handled in every respect as if he were an adult.
Pagina 6 - Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Pagina 23 - A juvenile offender who has been charged with or adjudicated for conduct which would not under the law of the jurisdiction In which the offense was committed, be a crime If committed by an adult (i) Non-offender.
Pagina 39 - The child may be detained in a jail or other facility for the detention of adults only if the facility in...
Pagina 57 - ALABAMA. ALASKA. . . ARIZONA. ARKANSAS .... CALIFORNIA . . COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE . . . DIST. OF COL. FLORIDA. . GEORGIA. GUAM HAWAII IDAHO ILLINOIS . . INDIANA IOWA KANSAS KENTUCKY LOUISIANA MAINE MARYLAND MASSACHUSETTS . . MICHIGAN MINNESOTA MISSISSIPPI MISSOURI MONTANA NEBRASKA . . NEVADA NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA . NORTH DAKOTA . . . OHIO OKLAHOMA OREGON PENNSYLVANIA . . . PUERTO RICO RHODE ISLAND.
Informații bibliografice
| Titlu | A Comparative Analysis of Juvenile Codes |
| Autor | Jane L. King |
| Persoane care au contribuit | United States. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Community Research Forum |
| Editor | The Office, 1980 |
| Exemplar original de la | Universitatea din Michigan |
| Scanată la | 27 aug. 2007 |
| Lungime | 90 pagini |
| Exportă citatul | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |