 | William Josephus Robinson - 1928 - 1000 pagini
...Brandeis concurred — OW Holmes. There is a true, old-time American, one who believes in real liberty, in free thought, "not free thought for those who agree with us, but freedom for thought that we hate." What a difference between Holmes and Brandeis on the one hand, and men like... | |
 | 1931 - 490 pagini
...matters are worth our study as ideals in Americanism. "If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other...admission into, as well as to life within, this country" - US vs. Rosika Schwimmer, excluded pacifist. "It is desirable that criminals should be detected, and... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Immigration - 1932 - 108 pagini
...famous dissenting decision in the Schwimmer case : . If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other...well as to life within this country. And recurring to this opinion that bars this applicant's way, I would suggest that the Quakers have done their share... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Immigration - 1932 - 104 pagini
...famous dissenting decision in the Schwimmer case : If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other...well as to life within this country. And recurring to this opinion that bars this applicant's way, I would suggest that the Quakers have done their share... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Immigration and Naturalization - 1932 - 274 pagini
...construction seems an unfortunate one. Mr. Justice Holmes said in his dissenting opinion in the Schwimmer case: " If there is any principle of the Constitution...attachment than any other, it is the principle of free though— not free thought for those who agree with us, but freedom for the thought that we hate. I... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation - 1937 - 1340 pagini
...Holmes of the United States Supreme Court declared: "If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other,...with us, but freedom for the thought that we hate ' '. Ittue I* Dictatorship or Democracy The Section concludes from its studies and deliberations that... | |
 | United States. Office of Education - 1937 - 1296 pagini
...employee for what he says? III. WATCH THIS SPOT! 1. "If there is any principle of the constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other,...principle of free thought — not free thought for those that agree with us, but freedom for the thought we hate." — OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES. 2. "I disagree... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Post Roads - 1943 - 102 pagini
...Justice Holmes in the Schwimmer case is a good one, "If there is any . principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other,...free thought for those who agree with us, but freedom of thought for those we hate." That may be difficult to apply to a particular case, I admit. That is... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Post Roads - 1943 - 108 pagini
...Justice Holmes in the Schwimmer case is a good one, "If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other,...free thought for those who agree with us, but freedom of thought for those we hate." That may be difficult to apply to a particular case, I admit. That is... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1944 - 922 pagini
...judged by conformity to prevailing thought because, "if there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other...with us, but freedom for the thought that we hate." Id. See also countenance a political intolerance as despotic, as wicked, and capable of as bitter and... | |
| |
If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other it is the principle of free thought — not free thought for those who agree with us, but freedom for the thought that we hate. 
