Amending Nationality Act of 1940: Hearings ... Subcommittee on Immigration and Naturalization ... on H.R. 22861947 - 43 pagini |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 1 - 5 din 12
Pagina 1
... alien who , after September 21 , 1922 , has married or marries a citizen of the United States , or whose spouse is naturalized during the existence of the marital relation may , if eligible to naturalization , and if such alien shall ...
... alien who , after September 21 , 1922 , has married or marries a citizen of the United States , or whose spouse is naturalized during the existence of the marital relation may , if eligible to naturalization , and if such alien shall ...
Pagina 2
... alien requesting citizenship shall say that he shall bear arms in defense of the United States if required . It seems to me that it is a perfectly reasonable requirement , or preliminary statement , that might be made by nearly anyone ...
... alien requesting citizenship shall say that he shall bear arms in defense of the United States if required . It seems to me that it is a perfectly reasonable requirement , or preliminary statement , that might be made by nearly anyone ...
Pagina 5
... alien who refused to bear arms in defense of this country could not be admitted to citizenship in it . On that date that historic rule was nullified and reversed . An applicant otherwise acceptable must now be admitted to citizenship ...
... alien who refused to bear arms in defense of this country could not be admitted to citizenship in it . On that date that historic rule was nullified and reversed . An applicant otherwise acceptable must now be admitted to citizenship ...
Pagina 6
... alien may claim as of right only upon compliance with the terms which Congress imposes . " That it is the duty of citizens by force of arms to defend our Government against all enemies whenever necessity arises is a fundamental ...
... alien may claim as of right only upon compliance with the terms which Congress imposes . " That it is the duty of citizens by force of arms to defend our Government against all enemies whenever necessity arises is a fundamental ...
Pagina 7
... alien asking for citizenship ? What proof of loyalty should be required before an alien is honored with the privileges of naturalization ? Mr. Justice Holmes in his dissent in the Schwimmer case injected the principle of free thought ...
... alien asking for citizenship ? What proof of loyalty should be required before an alien is honored with the privileges of naturalization ? Mr. Justice Holmes in his dissent in the Schwimmer case injected the principle of free thought ...
Termeni și expresii frecvente
admitted to citizenship amend section amended U. S. C. American Bar Association American citizenship arms in defense arms in support Bar Association Journal bear arms become a citizen believe bill bombs Brethren Chairman CHELF Christian citizen spouse committee Congress conscientious objectors decision deportation dissent DOLLIVER DP camps ED GOSSETT EMANUEL CELLER English language Europe exemption February issue fight Girouard GOSSETT Government intention Jehovah's Witnesses legislation Macintosh and Schwimmer martyr complex Mennonite Central Committee military service Nationality Act naturalized citizen oath of allegiance opinion pacifist period of residence person principle Quakers qualified allegiance Qualify Their Allegiance question read the English refusal to bear religious scruples represent ROBSION ROCKMORE section 310 Selective Service Act SHAUGHNESSY SMUCKER STATEMENT statute STEWART support and defense Supreme Court take the oath things tion United vote Women's International League ZIGLER
Pasaje populare
Pagina 2 - I hereby declare on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty...
Pagina 5 - ... support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and bear true faith and allegiance to the same.
Pagina 8 - One may serve his country faithfully and devotedly, though his religious scruples make it impossible for him to shoulder a rifle. Devotion to one's country can be as real and as enduring among non-combatants as among combatants. One may adhere to what he deems to be his obligation to God and yet assume all military risks to secure victory. The effort of war is indivisible; and those whose religious scruples prevent them from killing are no less patriots than those whose special traits or handicaps...
Pagina 1 - America pursuant to law, and the court having found that the petitioner had resided continuously within the United States for at least five years and in...
Pagina 2 - States when required by law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion : So, help me God.
Pagina 7 - Some of her answers might excite popular prejudice, but if there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other it is the principle of free thought — not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.
Pagina 2 - ... <1> to support the Constitution of the United States; (2) to renounce and abjure absolutely and entirely all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which the...
Pagina 1 - In lieu of the five-year period of residence within the United States and the one-year period of residence within the State or Territory where the naturalization court is held, she shall have resided continuously in the United States, Hawaii, Alaska, or Porto Rico for at least one year immediately preceding the filing of the petition.
Pagina 1 - States by reason of such marriage or naturalization; but, if eligible to citizenship, she may be naturalized upon full and complete compliance with all requirements of the naturalization laws...
Pagina 6 - Macintosh case. The oath required of aliens does not in terms require that they promise to bear arms. Nor has Congress expressly made any such finding a prerequisite to citizenship. To hold that it is required is to read it into the Act by implication. But we could not assume that Congress intended to make such an abrupt and radical departure from our traditions unless it spoke in unequivocal terms.