Why Not Kill Them All?: The Logic and Prevention of Mass Political MurderPrinceton University Press, 2 sept. 2008 - 288 pagini Genocide, mass murder, massacres. The words themselves are chilling, evoking images of the slaughter of countless innocents. What dark impulses lurk in our minds that even today can justify the eradication of thousands and even millions of unarmed human beings caught in the crossfire of political, cultural, or ethnic hostilities? This question lies at the heart of Why Not Kill Them All? Cowritten by historical sociologist Daniel Chirot and psychologist Clark McCauley, the book goes beyond exploring the motives that have provided the psychological underpinnings for genocidal killings. It offers a historical and comparative context that adds up to a causal taxonomy of genocidal events. Rather than suggesting that such horrors are the product of abnormal or criminal minds, the authors emphasize the normality of these horrors: killing by category has occurred on every continent and in every century. But genocide is much less common than the imbalance of power that makes it possible. Throughout history human societies have developed techniques aimed at limiting intergroup violence. Incorporating ethnographic, historical, and current political evidence, this book examines the mechanisms of constraint that human societies have employed to temper partisan passions and reduce carnage. Might an understanding of these mechanisms lead the world of the twenty-first century away from mass murder? Why Not Kill Them All? makes clear that there are no simple solutions, but that progress is most likely to be made through a combination of international pressures, new institutions and laws, and education. If genocide is to become a grisly relic of the past, we must fully comprehend the complex history of violent conflict and the struggle between hatred and tolerance that is waged in the human heart. |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 1 - 5 din 32
... their action, and we need to take that reasoning seriously, even if we entirely disagree with it. Thus, to say that the Ottoman authorities who initiated the genocide of Armenians really thought that the Armenians threatened 4 Introduction.
... threatened the survival of the empire and even the survival of an independent Turkish state infuriates some Armenian nationalists who maintain that there was no such threat, only blind Turkish prejudice. We can debate whether or not ...
... threatened, and to mass murder against those who most stand in our way or endanger us. But our psychological predispositions lead us in the opposite direction as well, toward love and an aversion to killing. It is only by accepting this ...
... threaten the very survival of a Turkish and Muslim Ottoman Empire (Adanır 2001, 71–81). Finally, Hitler perceived Jews as a racially polluting, dangerous disease that threatened the strength of the German Aryan race and as members of a ...
... threatened his control. Their ethnicity was irrelevant. Governor Lumpkin, on the other hand, had contempt for the Cherokees and considered all Native Americans as (in his words) “a savage race of heathens.” But he viewed them as more of ...
Cuprins
1 | |
11 | |
The Psychological Foundations of Genocidal Killing | 51 |
Why Is Limited Warfare More Common Than Genocide? | 95 |
Strategies to Decrease the Chances of Mass Political Murder in Our Time | 149 |
Our Question Answered | 211 |
References | 219 |
Index | 249 |
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Why Not Kill Them All?: The Logic and Prevention of Mass Political Murder Daniel Chirot,Clark McCauley Previzualizare limitată - 2010 |
Why Not Kill Them All?: The Logic and Prevention of Mass Political Murder Daniel Chirot,Clark McCauley Previzualizare limitată - 2006 |
Why Not Kill Them All?: The Logic and Prevention of Mass Political Murder Daniel Chirot,Clark McCauley Previzualizare limitată - 2008 |