Imagini ale paginilor
PDF
ePub

sible that a difference of opinion should arise among sage divines respecting any subject not elucidated by the written law and its verbal exposition, the Divine Wisdom, in order to obviate every inconvenience, has determined that, in all such cases, the majority of these sage divines decide: As it is written, "Incline. thyself after the majority;" (Exodus xxiii. 2';) and although the minority may be more highly gifted than the majority, yet the latter decide, and the former are bound to abide by their decision. But by "the majority" are understood only pious men and sages; nor can the vulgar and ignorant ever be admitted to cause or swell that majority; as it is a fact confirmed by experience, that the vulgar are more prone to err than to admit the truth.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

These words את הדברים האלה

spake the Lord unto all your congregation;" (Deut. v. 22;) relating to that part of the Decalogue which teaches the knowledge of the existence of the Deity, his immateriality, his being the Creator of the universe, his revelations, and providence, &c. This knowledge emanates directly from his own wisdom, by which it is imparted. The second teaches what is acceptable unto Him-blessed be HE! This emanates from his will; nor can any other reason be assigned for its performance than its being commanded by, and acceptable to, Him. Such are the prohibitions of wearing yw, "mingled garments," of sowing mixed seeds, the law of the red heifer, and others; into the reasons for which we cannot penetrate. These are called

66

'pin, statutes," which we are bound to obey in accordance with the revealed will of God. The third teaches to do right and to avoid wrong, in all dealings between man and man. This emanates from the power of

God, and is called 'wp, “judg ments." It is evident that the laws of civilization cannot comprise either the first or the second of these two

objects, as we have already fully demonstrated: For the great truths of religion are altogether beyond the reach of human reason; and philosophy is insufficient to come to any decision; and it is equally impossible for man to know the particular and minute actions which are acceptable to the Deity. In both instances Divine revelation is his only instructer. The utmost extent of the laws of civilization are therefore limited to the third object; as their purpose is the endeavour to promote right, and prevent wrong, between man and man, to determine the rights of man, and uphold the institutions of society. But even in these objects mature reflection will show us the insufficiency of the laws of civilization, their incompetency to decide with precision, and in every case to administer real justice. What human reason is capable of deciding, what ought to be the just extent of penalty inflicted on a thief? whether he is to restore twofold, threefold, or sevenfold? Accordingly legislators vary in their enactments. Some condemn the thief to death, be his theft large or small; which is altogether contrary to reason, inasmuch as there is no proportion observed between the crime and its punishment. He stole property, and he forfeits life. Other legislators award imprisonment, which affords no compensation to the party despoiled: Whereas the Divine law apportions the punishment of the thief with the most just precision, and according to the degrees of criminality. He who denies having received that which has been confided to him, (an inferior species of theft,) is to restore twofold. He who steals a lamb must restore four-fold; and for an ox, five-fold; thus adapting the amount of compensation to the extent of in jury: And in every case, if the thief has not wherewithal to pay the fine, he is sold for his theft. (Exodus xxii. 3.) The punishment thus apportioned is in perfect accordance with the most equitable dictates of

justice: He who injures another in
his property must make compensa-
tion in proportion to the utility of
the object abstracted; and if he has
not wherewithal to make that com-
pensation, his own body must pay,
not by being locked up in a prison,
(thus affording no real compensation
to him who is injured,) but by being
sold, and compelled to work until
the produce of his labour has made
good the compensation awarded by
the law. Should he, however, steal
a human being with intent to sell
him as a slave, no pecuniary punish-
ment can compensate the outrage on
society and violation of the rights of
man which he has committed: His
crime ceases to be a simple theft,
and death is the only adequate pun-
ishment. (Deut. xiv. 7.) All the
Divine enactments respecting man's
duties to society and to his fellow-
men evince the same spirit of the
strictest possible equity and justice;
and are therefore infinitely superior
to the wavering and arbitrary enact.
ments framed by man, and called
civilization. Accordingly the Sacred
Singer, having, in the one hundred
and forty-seventh Psalm, fixed his
mind on the wisdom, will, and power

of the Creator, and his providential care of man, concludes, by exclaiming, "He has declared 77, his words to Jacob, 11 pin, his statutes and his judgments to Israel. He has not done so to any nation, and judgments has he not made known to them. Hallelujah." (Verses 19, 20.) His meaning is, that the greatest of all the beneficent mercies of the Deity he vouchsafed to bestow on Israel, when he revealed to them 1717, his words, pn, his statutes, and D, his judgments. That he has not done so to any other nation, not only with respect to the first two, (which are altogether beyond the reach of simple humanity unaided by revelation,) but that even those judgments which merely regulate the duties of man towards his fellow-men and society, He has not made known (in their purity and perfection) to those who took upon themselves the right of framing laws for their fellow-men. And so great is the sense of the Psalmist of the importance of these mercies, that, at a loss for words adequately to express his gratitude, he gives vent to his feelings in the short but expressive "Hallelujah." (To be continued.)

III. COMMENTARIES ON HOLY WRIT.

JACOB'S VOW.

AND Jacob vowed a vow and said, If God will be with me, and will preserve me in this way that I go, and will give me bread to eat, and raiment to put on, so that I return in peace to my father's house, then, shall the Lord be my God; and this stone which I have erected for a monument shall be God's house; and of all that thou givest me I will surely give the tenth unto thee. (Genesis xxviii. 20—22.)

ACCORDING to the above version it would appear that Jacob proposed a sort of agreement to the Deity, and stipulated, that if certain conditions, which he enumerates, were duly and truly performed in his favour, then, and in that case only, the Lord should be his God, and that he would erect a house to His worship, and consecrate a tithe of his property to holy purposes.

It is scarcely necessary to dwell on the inconsistency of the supposition, that Jacob-the grandson of

Abraham, to whom the Highest authority vouchsafes to grant this testimony, "I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, that they shall observe the ways of the Lord;" (Genesis xviii. 19;)-the son of Isaac, to whom the Lord gave the assurance, "I am with thee, and will bless thee;" (Genesis xxvi. 24 ;) -that Jacob who has previously, in Holy Writ, been called on, "a perfect man," (Genesis xxv. 27,) should make his faith in the God of

his fathers dependent on his success in life. Accordingly, the wording in the original does not bear out the construction of the translator, who falls into the error of mistaking a conjunctive 1, for a conversive one. The proper rendering is, "So that I return in peace to my father's house,

ledge the existence of the Deity abstractedly, is not sufficient to merit the name of religion; as, in addition to that acknowledgment, we are bound to confess, that the Deity regards the deeds of men. For, unless that admission is made, there can be no Divine commands;

and the Lord the obedience to which constitutes והיה ה' לי לאלהים

has been unto me a God, then this stone, &c., '', shall be a house of God." &c. According to this, which is the true version, it is evident that

what is properly called "Religion." There is but little difference between him who says, "There is no God," and him who says, There is a

[ocr errors]

God, but He does not concern himself והיה ה' לי לאלהים the words

66

are not a promise for the future, that the Lord shall be his God, but a reasoning upon the past, that the Lord has been his God, or, in other words, that the Divine protection and providence has been especially afforded to him. These words are thus no part of his vow, which is confined to the erecting of a house of prayer, and consecrating a tithe of his property. His faith in his God is not conditional, or made a matter of stipulation; but he adduces it as a reason why he should perform the vow which he is about to make. The simple meaning of the words he uses is, If I am preserved in this most dangerous journey, and during my uncertain absence; if in my forlorn condition I find my necessary sustenance; if, notwithstanding the enmity of my powerful and incensed brother, I may hereafter return in peace to my father's house: All this must prove to me, that the same special providence of the Lord which has hitherto been my protection will always attend me: And, therefore, I will erect a house of prayer to his holy name, and consecrate to him one tenth of my possessions; for whatever I have is a gift from him.”

Such was the plain and obvious meaning of Jacob: It is, however, proper to explain why he at all used the words, "And the Lord has been unto me a God;" and the connexion between these words, the building of a house of prayer, and paying a tithe.

We therefore say, The basis of all religion is, 1. The belief in the existence of the Deity. 2. Obedience to his precepts. To acknow

about mankind." The first of these two classes Holy Writ declares to be a fool: As it is written, "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God;" (Psalm xiv 1;) and SoloAnswer not mon's direction is, " the fool in his folly." The second class is subdivided into two distinct parties: 1. Those who altogether deny the Divine intervention în terrestrial affairs: 2. Those who assert that the Supreme Being has delegated that intervention to secondary Both these powers or influences. erroneous opinions were at different times entertained by the Israelites. With reference to the first, we read: "The sins of the house of Israel and of Judah are very great; the land is full of blood, and the city is full of vice: For they say, The Lord has abandoned the earth, the Lord does not behold." (Ezekiel ix. 9.) The second opinion we find in the Prophet: "And Jeremiah was answered by all the men who knew that their wives offered incense to other gods, and by all the women who were present, a great assembly, even all the people who dwell in the land of Egypt and at Pathros, who all said, In the word which thou hast told us in the name of the Lord we will not

Our

obey thee; for we will assuredly do
all that our mouths have pronounced,
to offer incense to the queen of hea-
ven, and to pour out libations unto
her; as we have done, we,
fathers, our kings, and our princes,
in the cities of Judah, and the
streets of Jerusalem, when we en-
joyed plenty, were well off, and be-
But ever since we
held no evil.
have ceased to offer incense to the
queen of heaven, and to pour out

libations unto her, we have been de prived of all, and are consumed by sword and famine." (Jeremiah xxiv. 15-18.) This last opinion leads to idolatry, or the worshipping of strange gods, and is most strictly prohibited by the law of Moses, as tending to pervert mankind to their own great detriment, by inducing them to withhold obedience where alone it is due, and to prostitute that homage which ought to be yielded to the Most High alone, according to their vitiated ideas. That the first opinion is not as expressly prohibited in that law, or condemned in words as plain and direct, is not because it is less pernicious or false than the other, but because the whole tenor of the law, its spirit, and enactments afford the fullest and most complete refutation of that absurd idea. The ancients, how liable soever to err, seldom disputed or called in question a Supreme Direction of the universe: Simple children of nature, they observed its operations, and felt that an invisible Guide directed and presided over all sublunary as well as all celestial subjects. They seldom attributed those operations to chance; but, while they owned the supremacy of rule, the question with them was, "Who is the ruler?" The limited faculties of man in that primitive age rendered him prone to superstition, which engendered fabulous deities, and imposed the worship of sticks and stones: As his limited faculties in modern times render him prone to presumption, which engenders arrogance and infidelity, and imposes the belief in chance as the author of all that is; an idea to the full as ridiculous and pernicious as idolatry.

These two opinions have ever borne sway over the mind of man, unenlightened by revelation. When the Israelites rebelled against their Great Benefactor, their question was

[ocr errors]

is predicted: My wrath will be kindled against them: On that day I will forsake them and hide my face from them: They shall be consumed and many evils and calamities shall befall them. And they shall say, Is it not because my God is not in me that all these calamities befall me? But I will hide my face from them on that day because of all the evil which they have committed." (Deut. xxxi. 17, 18.) When the punishment of their evil deeds befall them, they cry out, "We suffer because the Deity does not concern himself about us or about mankind: " Whereas they are expressly told, "I turn my face from you on that day; because of your evil deeds I will for a time turn my face from you, and you shall be abandoned !

Belief in the Divine Government, without which there can be no religion, was uppermost in Jacob's mind. Accordingly he says, "If my urgent wants are supplied, if I escape all dangers, and, contrary to the expectation entertained by myself and those who best know the circumstances which forced me to fly, if I return in peace to my father's house; it will thence be proved, that I am not abandoned to chance or to the governance of secondary influences, but that the Lord has been unto me a God, evincing himself as such by the especial protection afforded to

me.

This great truth it behoves me to make generally known to mankind; and, therefore, I will raise a house of prayer to Him to whom all prayer must be directed, and I will devote a tenth of my possessions to His service."

Man is superior to all other animals, because he acts according to his own will and determination. Nevertheless there are certain things which he does, as it were, intuitively, and in common with all other animals, to which nature has given certain instincts for their preserva

tion ; instincts which undoubtedly"-היש אלהי בקרבנו אם אין

If

my God is within me or not." (Exodus xvii. 7.) Does my God search and investigate my inward parts, and know whatsoever concerns me, or does he not regard me? This doubt in after-times led to the manifold sins and punishments of Israel, as

are not bestowed in vain, but the infallible effects of which can be obviously deduced. Thus, it is as natural and intuitive to man, that, when in danger, he should scream, as it is natural and instinctive to the cat, if thrown or falling from any height,

so to contract her body that on alighting on the ground she finds her centre of gravity on her legs. Man, when threatened with imminent peril in an absolute wilderness, where he is sure no human being can afford him assistance, will nevertheless shout and scream, because his doing so is intuitive and as independent of his will as is the action of putting forth his hands to save his head when falling. That the cry of pain is implanted in us by nature, is proved by the new-born infant, who, although unconscious of surrounding objects, utters his plaintive wail.

This intuitive impulse, not to call it instinct, is not implanted without a wise purpose: The cries of man for help, if they reach any human ear, will procure assistance from his fellow-men. And such a cry is prayer. It is innate in man to implore the aid of a Superior Being when exposed to immediate danger. Let it not be said that this is the effect of education alone. Even the man who has never been taught to believe in a God, much less to pray, will, notwithstanding, in the hour of his utmost need, utter some sound of invocation and of supplication. No man who was in danger of being engulfed by an earthquake, or of sinking under the billows, ever yet resigned life, without some involuntary exclamation, such as, "O God!" or even a simple "O!" bursting from his lips: Nor is the last of these, though a single plaintive sound, less a prayer than the first. This most

66

forcibly demonstrates, that prayer in its rudest form is intuitive to man; and as nature bestows no instinct in vain, it confirms the words of Holy Writ : Then wilt thou call, and the Lord will answer; thou wilt scream, and the Lord will reply, Here I am!" (Isaiah lviii. 9.) Therefore Jacob vowed to erect a house to the Lord, that mankind might there be instructed how and to whom to pray.

It remains for us shortly to notice, why Jacob vowed to consecrate a tenth of his property to the service of the Lord, and why, previous to the giving of the law in the days of Abraham and Melchizedek, and through the enactments of the law down to the present times, one part in every ten has been set aside for the service of the Lord. The ancients assumed the various heavenly powers and influences to be ten; to which those who assigned the government of the world to the celestial constellations attributed all the good that they enjoyed. The worshippers of the true God, therefore, in order to express the real source of every good, and their independence of those ten influences, consecrated to him one part in ten of their increase, whether it were produced by agricultural or by commercial pursuits; thus breaking in upon the supposed symbolical number, and evincing their gratitude to their only true Benefactor: As it is said, "Every thing is from thee and from thy hand we give to thee." (1 Chron, xxix. 14.)

[blocks in formation]
« ÎnapoiContinuă »