COLOUR OF THE STARS. 23 and Benetnasch. This star, it is true, had a special use: it served the Arabs as the test of a good eyesight. A further proof that the Arabs founded their stellar nomenclature almost exclusively upon the lustre and colour of the stars, is obvious in the names which they gave to the stars forming the constellation of Orion. (See Fig. 2.) Thus, a and ẞ, two stars of the first magnitude, occupying the right or eastern shoulder, and the left or western foot of the gianthunter, are called respectively, Betelguese and Rigel; the star y, named Bellatrix, in the left shoulder, is of the second magnitude, like the stars d,, 2, which represent Orion's Belt, and bear the names of "the Three Kings" and "St James's Staff." Now the star, marking the right knee or inferior eastern angle of the brilliant trapezium, is only of the third magnitude; therefore, it has received no special designation. The colour by which some stars are distinguished could not have failed to be remarked by those observers who first began to enumerate, or take census of, the celestial bodies. Thus Sirius, the most refulgent of the stars of heaven, situated in Canis Major, is of a bluish-white, like Rigel; and Arcturus, situated on the prolongation of the tail of Ursa Major, is reddish-yellow, like Betelguese. Sirius, or the Dog-star, rose heliacally at the hottest time of the year, and hence the Greeks were accustomed to ascribe all the diseases of the season to its influence. It was "The star Autumnal; of all stars, in dead of night, 24 UNSEEN STARS. Brightest it shines, but ominous, and dire To sum up the figurative grouping of the stars, the variety of their luminous magnificence, their position towards Polaris, the determination of that position by the longitudinal circles passing through the axis of the world, and twisted perpendicularly to this axis by the circles parallel to the Equator, - such is the aggregate of the elements which must, at a very early period, have presided over the enumeration of those sparkling points, each of which is the centre of a system. Finally, are there any stars which the eye cannot perceive? Such a question would never have been propounded to the ancients. And why? Because no reasoning would have drawn from them an admission that it was possible by artificial means to enlarge the range of our eyesight. They would have deemed it madness to pretend to improve and develope what is not of human creation; the visual apparatus, as it is bestowed on us by nature, they supposed to be the most perfect instrument which man could imagine. And, in truth, nothing could fairly be objected to this way of looking at things. The 48 constellations (21 northern, 12 zodiacal, and 15 austral) indicated by Ptolemæus, contain a total of 1026 stars, whose relative positions had been determined by Hipparchus. To undertake an enumeration of the stars, and to transmit the result to posterity, appeared to Pliny an audacity before which THE QUESTION ENLARGED. 25 even a god would have recoiled (Hipparchus—ausus, rem etiam Deo improbam, annumerare posteris stellas).* Yet numerous doubts had already risen in the mind of Hipparchus as to the accuracy of the number recognised. In the first place, the ancients undoubtedly knew, as we do, that the visual faculty is not the same in all individuals; that there are some who, in the same celestial space, see more stars than others. Many persons can discern up to stars of the seventh magnitude, while with others the sight fails far within that limit. The ancients must also have known, as we do, that, for the enumeration to be complete, the sky must be observed from all the points of the terrestrial surface on which man is planted. Even in our own days the catalogues of the southern heavens are far from being perfect. Finally, more than two thousand years before the time of Galileo, Democritus had already enunciated the opinion that the Milky Way was a mass of innumerable stars. All these signs should have been accepted as warnings against premature affirmations. The invention of telescopes suddenly enlarged the question, and it became necessary to establish a line of demarcation between the number of stars visible to the naked eye and the number visible through the agency of the telescope. Argelander, the author of the "Uranometria," has found that the stars visible to the naked eye, over the entire surface of the heavens, range from 5000 to 5800. Otto Struve, employing Herschel's method of computation, has estimated at upwards * Pliny, "Historia Naturalis," Book ii., 24. 26 CAN WE COUNT THE STARS? of twenty millions (20,374,034) the number of stars visible with the Herschel 20-feet telescope. But, in presence of all the nebulæ resolvable into stellar masses, and before the development of the artificial range of our sight,-in presence, finally, of that hopeless perspective which the more we discover the more we perceive how much there remains to discover,-are we not forcibly carried back to our point of departure? Ought not the imagination which, at the first glance, led us to believe the number of stars to be infinite,-ought it not to draw us nearer to the truth? How should the imagination reveal to us, without difficulty, THE NORTHERN CONSTELLATIONS. 27 what the intellect, assisted by the senses, can only discover after ages of assiduous exertion ? These questions, it seems to us, are worthy of our studious consideration. We subjoin a table of the constellations in both hemispheres, with the number of stars in each, for the convenience of our younger readers. |