BOOK II. navigator, or architect, it is not enough that he is advised to be one, that he is convinced by the arguments of his adviser, that it would be for his advantage to be one, and that he resolves to be one, but he must also be taught the principles of the art, be shewn all the methods of working, and how to acquire the habits of using properly all the instruments; and thus regularly and gradually he arrives by practice at some perfection in the art. If he does not proceed thus, he is apt to meet with difficulties that discourage him, and make him drop the pursuit. My Art of Virtue has also its instruments, and teaches the manner of using them. Christians are directed to have faith in CHRIST as the effectual means of obtaining the change they desire. It It may, when sufficiently strong, be effectual with many : for a full opinion, that a Teacher is infinite entitled Protagoras. Plutarch has likewise a short Essay to prove Ὅτι διδακτον ἡ ἀρετη. And Cicero seems to convey the same opinion when he says Consuetudo exercitatioque capienda, ut boni ratiocinatores officiorum esse possimus: And indeed the whole of his Treatise de Officiis is nothing but an Art of Virtue. ly wise, good, and powerful, and that he will have this faith in so weak a degree, that it I hope for the benefit of your corrections *. A a 4 -I am &c. B. FRANKLIN, It does not appear that the little work here mentioned was ever given to the public. CHAP. III. BOOK II. Elements of CHAPTER IV. "Elements of Criticism."—Origin and Progress of Cri Ir appears from the letters of several of meditated an extensive work on the Principles of Criticism. In treating this subject, it was his design to proceed altogether on a new plan, and to adopt a mode of investigation different from that which had been followed by any preceding writers, either among the ancients or moderns: a design, therefore, in which, I think, he has the merit of originality, and is justly entitled to the praise of being the inventor of a science; I mean that which has been with propriety termed Philosophical Criticism. As this may at first sight appear a bold assertion, it is necessary to be at some pains in illustrating and supporting it. In speculating on the moral and intellectual nature of man, a subject which seems to have been the favourite study of Lord Kames in every period of his life, and in reflecting on the various sources of our enjoyments, it had often occurred to him as a matter of surprise, that ingenious and able men had never turned their attention to investigate, in a truly philosophical manner, the causes of that pleasure which is derived from the productions of the fine arts of СНАР. IV. BOOK II. Poetry, Painting, Sculpture, Music, and Architecture in other words, to trace the rules of criticism to their true principles in the constitution of the human mind, and the nature of the passions and affections. Origin and progress of Criticism. It is an obvious remark, that works of genius in the fine arts existed before the knowledge or the discovery of any rules for the formation of such works, and that the first critics drew the laws of their art from a nice examination of the productions of the poets, painters, sculptors, musicians and architects, which were found to have given pleasure to the general taste. But it is an observation equally worthy of notice, though perhaps it will not be so readily assented to, that not only those first critics, but all who have followed them in the same department, down to modern times, had, till very lately, founded their rules of criticism on no other basis than authority, or the practice of the poets, painters and other artists; and that not one of those critics had ever thought of ascending but a single step higher in the inquiry, by putting the following question, Whether those rules are agreeable to human |