Imagini ale paginilor
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

V.

Minnesota.- German-Am. Bk. of Ritzville v. Lyons (1914), 149 N. W. 658; Security Nat. Bk. v. PulAm. ver (1915), 155 N. W. 641; Grant Co. Multigraph Sales (1916), 160 N. W. 676; Bank of Montreal v. Bucher (1916), 157 N. W. 1070; Baxter v. Brandenburg (1917), 163 N. W. 517; Baxter v. Brandenburg (1917), 163 N. W. 516. V. Moore Mississippi.- Sykes (1917), 76 So. 538.

Missouri. Wright v. Miss. Valley Tr. Co. (1910), 129 S. W. 407; Reeves v. Litts (1910), 143 Mo. App. 196, 128 S. W. 246; Dorris v. Cronan (1910), 129 S. W. 1014; Nat. Bk. of Commerce in St. Louis v. Morris (1911), 156 Mo. App. 43, 135 S. W. 1008; Golden City Banking Co. v. Greisel (1912), 161 Mo. App. 477; State Bk. of Freeport v. Cape Girardeau & C. R. Co. (1913), 155 S. W. 1111; Greer v. Orchard (1913), 161 S. W. 875; Citizens Bk. of Pomono v. Oaks (1914), 179 S. W. 679; Citizens Nat. Bk. v. Bombauer (1916), 189 S. W. 651; Central Bk. of Columbia v. Lydia (1917), 191 S. W. 245; Shawhan v. Distillery Co. (1917), 197 S. W. 369; Bank of Greentop v. Sloop

(1918), 200 S. W. 304; Boatmen's Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co. (1918), 205 S. W. 629; First Nat. Bk. v. Henry (1918), 202 S. W. 281.

Montana. Parchen v. Chessman (1914), 142 Pac. 631.

Nebraska.-Benton V. Sikyta (1909), 84 Neb. 808, 122 S. W. 60; Farmers Nat. Bk. of Lyons v. Dixon (1912), 91 Neb. 652, 136 N. W. 845; Livestock Nat. Bk. v. Bragonier (1915), 153 N. W. 504; Macke v. Jungels (1918), 166 N. W. 191.

New Jersey.- Travis v. Unkart (1916), 99 Atl. 320.

New York.- Riverside Bank V. Woodhaven Junction Land Co. (1898), 34 A. D. 359; Citizens Nat. Bk. v. Lilienthal (1899), 40 A. D. 609; Brewster v. Schrader (1899), 26 Misc. 480; Rosenwald v. Goldstein (1899), 27 Misc. 827; Petrie v. Miller (1901), 57 A. D. 17, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1042, 173 N. Y. 596 (1903) (affirmed without an opinion); Sutherland v. Mead (1903), 80 A. D. 103, 80 N. Y. Supp. 504; Levy v. Huwer (1903), 80 A. D. 499; Roseman v. Mahoney (1903), 86 A. D. 377, 83 N. Y. Supp. 749; Bk. of Am. v. Waydell (1905), 103 A. D. 25, 92 N. Y. Supp. 666; Sutherland v. Mead, 80 A. D. 103; Roseman v. Mahoney, 86 A. D. 377; Milins v. Kauffman (1905), 104 A. D. 442, 93 N. Y. Supp. 669; Hover v. Magley (1905), 48 Misc. 430, 96 N. Y. Supp. 925; Nat. Bk. of Barre v. Foley (1907), 54 Misc. 126, 103 N. Y. Supp. 553; English v. Schlesinger (1907), 55 Misc. 584, 105 N. Y. Supp. 989; Mohlman Co. v. McKane (1901), 60 A. D. 546; The Gansevort Bk. of N. Y. v. Gilday (1907),

[blocks in formation]

(1908), 109 N. Y. Supp. 818, 58 Misc. 559; Rosenthal v. Parsont (1908), 110 N. Y. Supp. 223; Valley Dew Distilling Co. v. Ritzmann (1908), 110 N. Y. Supp. 917; Harris v. Fowler (1908), 110 N. Y. Supp. 987, 59 Misc. 523; Wallabout Bk. v. Peyton (1908), 123 A. D. 727, 108 N. Y. Supp. 42; Macauley v. Holsten (1909), 114 N. Y. Supp. 611; Mindlin v. Appelbaum (1909), 62 Misc. 300, 114 N. Y. Supp. 908; The Van Orden Tr. Co. v. L. Rosenberg, Inc. (1909), 62 Misc. 285, 114 N. Y. Supp. 1025; Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. Nat. Trading Co. (1909), 135 A. D. 391, 120 N. Y. Supp. 11; Lehrenkrauss v. Bonnell (1910), 199 N. Y. 240, 92 N. E. 637; Rogonski v. Brill (1911), 131 N. Y. Supp. 589; King v. Bowling Green Tr. Co. (1911), 145 A. D. 398; Maurice v. Bowler (1912), 138 N. Y. Supp. 424; Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. McGrath (1913), 142 N. Y. Supp. 496, 81 Misc. 222; Martin L. Hall v. Todd (1912), 139 N. Y. Supp. 111; Shape v. Shape (1914), 150 N. Y. Supp. 367; Union Bk. of Brooklyn v. Sullivan (1915), 108 N. E. 558, 214 N. Y. 332; Brown v. Rowan (1915), 154 N. Y. Supp. 1098; McBee Co. v. Shoemaker (1916), 169 N. Y. Supp. 834; Miller v. Campbell (1916), 160 N. Y. Supp. 834; Stokes v. Sanders (1918), 168 N. Y. Supp. 409; Lajani v. Abraham Schdala & Sons Corporation (1918), 171 N. Y. Supp. 611; American Brass & Copper Co.

[ocr errors]

v. Pine (1919), 173 N. Y. Supp. 147.

North Carolina.- Brooks v. Sullivan (1901), 129 N. Car. 190, 39 S. E. 822; Singer Mfg. Co. v. Summers (1906), 143 N. C. 102; 55 S. E. 522; Murchison Nat. Bk. v. Dunn Oil Mills Co. (1909), 150 N. Car. 718, 64 S. E. 885; J. L. Smathers & Co. v. Toxaway Hotel Co. (1913), 78 S. E. 224; Am. Ex. Nat. Bk. v. Segroves (1914), 82 S. E. 947; Franklin Nat. Bk. v. Roberts Bros. (1915), 84 S. E. 706; Am. Nat. Bk. of Richmond v. Hill (1915), 85 S. E. 209; Cherokee County v. Meroney (1917), 92 S. E. 616; Acme Mfg. Co. v. McCormick (1918), 95 S. E. 555; A. B. Hunter & Co. v. Sherron (1918), 97 S. E. 5.

North Dakota.- Second Nat. Bk. v. Warner (1910), 126 N. W. 100; Farmer's Bk. of Mercer Co. v. Riedlinger (1914), 146 N. W. 556; Sawyer State Bk. v. Sutherland (1917), 162 N. W. 696.

Ohio. State v. Hills (1916), 113 N. E. 1045.

Munger

Oklahoma.- Cain V. (1915), 149 Pac. 1086; Ogle v. Armstrong (1915), 153 Pac. 1139; State v. Soliss (1915), 152 Pac. 1114; Purcell Mill & Elevator Co. v. Canadian Val. Const. Co. (1916), 160 Pac. 485; First Nat. Bk. v. Harkey (1917), 163 Pac. 273; Starr v. Lonewolf (1917), 163 Pac. 532; Chandler v. Lach (1918), 170 Pac. 516; Levy v. Reed (1918), 170 Pac. 497.

Oregon. Matlock v. Scheuerman (1908), 51 Oreg. 49, 93 Pac. 823, 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 947; Anderson v. Stayton State Bank (1916), 159 Pac. 1033; Wicks v. Metcalf (1917), 163 Pac. 988.

Pennsylvania.-Rathfon v. Locher (1906), 215 Pac. 571; Allentown

Nat. Bk. v. Clay Product Supply Co. (1907), 217 Pa. St. 128, 66 Atl. 252; Morrison v. Whitefield (1912), 46 Pa. Super. 103; Levy v. Gilligan (1914), 90 Atl. 647.

Rhode Island.- Wilbour v. Hawkins (1915), 94 Atl. 856.

Tennessee.- Elgin City Bldg. Co. v. Hall (1907), 119 Tenn. 548, 108 S. W. 1068; Citizens Tr. Co. v. McDougal (1915), 178 S. W. 432.

Texas. Magill V. McCamley (1916), 182 S. W. 22; Yantis v. Jones (1916), 184 S. W. 572.

Utah.- Utah Nat. Bk. of Salt Lake City v. Nelson (1910), 38 Utah, 169, 111 Pac. 907; Felt v. Bush (1912), 126 Pac. 688; Miller v. Marks (1915), 148 Pac. 412; Smith v. Brown (1917), 165 Pac. 468; Manson v. Harris (1918), 170 Pac. 970.

Virginia. Payne v. Zell (1900), 98 Va. 294, 36 S. E. 379; Am. Bk. of Orange v. McComb (1906), 105 Va. 473, 54 S. E. 14; Saunders v. Bk. of Mecklenburg (1911), 71 S. E. 714; Ford v. Engelman (1915), 86 S. E. 852; Colley v. Summers Parrott Hardware Co. (1916), 89 S.

E. 906; Brenard Mfg. Co. v. Brown (1917), 92 S. E. 850.

Vermont.—Bean v. Parker (1916), 96 Atl. 17.

V.

Washington. Pitt V. Little (1910), 58 Wash. 355, 108 Pac. 941; German-Am. Bank of Seattle Wright (1915), 148 Pac. 769. West Virginia.- Burner v. Nutter (1915), 87 S. E. 359.

Wisconsin.- Hodge V. Wallace (1906), 129 Wis. 84, 108 N. W. 212, 116 Am. St. R. 938; Pelton v. Spider Lake S. & L. Co. (1907), 132 Wis. 219, 112 N. W. 29, 122 Am. St. 963; Marling v. Fitzgerald (1909), 138 Wis. 93, 120 N. W. 388; Samson v. Ward (1911), 147 Wis. 48, 132 N. W. 629; Becker v. Noegel (1917), 160 N. W. 1055, 165 Wis. 73; Badger Co. v. Columbia Co. (1917), 163 N. W. 188.

United States.-Barnsdall v. Waltemeyer (1905), 142 Fed. 415, 73 C. C. A. 515 (Colo.); Scherer & Co. v. Everest (1909), 168 Fed. 822, 94 C. C. A. 346; In re Hopper-Morgan Co. (1907), 154 Fed. 249 (N. Y.); Trust Co. of St. Louis Co. v. Markee (1910), 190 Fed. 126; Milton v. Pensacola Bk. & Tr. Co. (1911), 190 Fed. 126, 111 C. C. A. 166.

Section 26. Where value has at any time been given for the instrument, the holder is deemed a holder for value in respect to all parties who became such prior to that time.

Alabama. Armstrong v. Walker (1917), 76 So. 280; Hudson v. Repton State Bank (1917), 75 So. 695; Wilson v. Weaver (1917), 77 So. 238.

Idaho.- Kimpton v. Studebaker Bros. Co. (1908), 14 Ida. 552, 94 Pac. 1039.

Iowa.- Higby V. Bahrenfuss (1917), 163 N. W. 247.

Kentucky. Herman's Excr. V. Gregory (1909), 131 Ky. 819, 115 S. W. 809.

Maryland.— Black v. First Nat. Bk. (1903), 96 Md. 399, 54 Atl. 88. Massachusetts.- Jennings v. Law

[ocr errors]

(1908), 199 Mass. 124, 85 N. E. 157; Nat. Investment & Security Co. v. Carey (1916), 111 N. E. 357.

Michigan. First, Nat. Bk. V. Grand Rapids & I. Ry. Co. (1917), 161 N. W. 859; National Bank of Montreal v. Bucher (1916), 157 N. W. 1070.

Missouri.- Coleman V. Stocks (1911), 159 Mo. App. 43, 139 S. W. 216; Wright v. Wayland (1916), 188 S. W. 928; Wurlitzer Co. v. Rossman (1916), 190 S. W. 636; Howard v. Int. Bank (1918), 200 S. W. 91.

Montana.- State Bk. of Moore v. Fursythe (1910), 41 Mont. 249.

Nebraska. Nat. Bk. of Commerce v. Bossemeyer (1917), 162 N. W. 503.

New York.- Riverside Bk. V. Woodhaven Junction Land Co. (1898), 34 A. D. 350; Petrie v. Miller (1901), 57 A. D. 17, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1042, 173 N. Y. 596, affirmed without an opinion, 173 N. Y. 596 (1903); Fleitman v. Ashley (1901), 60 A. D. 201; Sutherland v. Mead (1903), 80 A. D. 103, 80 N. Y. Supp. 504; Rogers v. Morton (1905), 46 Misc. 494, 95 N. Y. Supp. 49; Hover v. Magley (1905), 48 Misc. 430, 96 N. Y. Supp. 925; Rosenthal v. Freedman (1907), 53 Misc. 595, 103 N. Y. Supp. 714; Cleary v. DeBeck Plate Glass Co. (1907), 54 Misc. 537, 104 N. Y. Supp. 831; Van Nordin Tr. Co. v. L. Rosenberg, Inc. (1909), 62 Misc. 285, 114 N. Y. Supp. 1025; Heimbach v. Doubleday, Page Co. (1909), 130 A. D.

34; King v. Bowling Green Tr. Co. (1911), 145 A. D. 398; Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. McGrath (1913), 143 N. Y. Supp. 496, 81 Misc. 222; Lich-und-Spakassa Audorf v. Pfizer (1913), 158 A. D. 505, 143 N. Y. Supp. 744; Munnich v. Joffe (1914), 149 N. Y. Supp. 338, 164 A. D. 30; Sabine v. Paine (1915), 151 N. Y. Supp. 735; Poshkoff v. Bernstein (1916), 159 N. Y. Supp. 206; Republican Art Printer V. David (1916), 159 N. Y. Supp. 1010.

Oklahoma.- Bledsoe v. City Nat. Bk. of Selma (1912), 7 Ala. App. 195, 60 So. 942; Miller v. Johnson (1914), 66 So. 486.

North Carolina.- Toms v. Jones (1900), 127 N. Car. 464; Citizens & Marine Bk. of Newport News v. Southern R. W. (1910), 153 N. Car. 346.

Bank Pennsylvania.- State of Pittsburg v. Kirk (1907), 216 Pa. St. 452.

[ocr errors]

Utah. McCormick V. Swem (1909), 36 Utah, 6, 102 Pac. 626; Felt v. Bush (1912), 126 Pac. 688. Washington. — Bradley Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. Heyburn (1910), 56 Wash. 628, 106 Pac. 170; Metzger v. Sigall (1914), 145 Pac. 72; Wash. Trust Co. v. Keyes (1915), 152 Pac. 1029; Skagit State Bk. v. Moody (1916), 150 Pac. 425.

United States.-Richards v. Street (1968), 31 App. D. C. 427; Milton v. Pensacola Bk. & Tr. Co. (1911), 190 Fed. 126, 111 C.. C. A. 166; In re Chas. R. Partridge Lumber Co. (1914), 215 Fed. 973.

Section 27. Where the holder has a lien on the instrument, arising either from contract or by implication of law, he is deemed a holder for value to the extent of his lien.

Alder

Connecticut.- Mersick v. man (1905), 77 Conn. 634, 60 Atl. 109.

Illinois. Peacock V. Phillips (1910), 155 Ill. App. 514.

Kentucky. Citizens Bk. v. Bk. of Waddy (1907), 126 Ky. 169, 103 S. W. 249; Campbell v. Fourth Nat. Bk. of Cincinnnati (1910), 137 Ky. 555, 126 S. W. 114; Am. Nat. Bk. v. Minor & Son (1911), 135 S. W. 278; Jett v. Standafer (1911), 143 Ky. 787, 137 S. W. 513; Elk Valley Coal Co. v. Third Nat. Bk. of Lexington (1914), 163 S. W. 766; Sparr v. Fulton Bank (1918), 201 S. W. 310.

Massachusetts.- Burnes v. New Mineral Fertil. Co. (1914), 105 N. E. 1074.

Michigan. Graham V. Smith (1908), 155 Mich. 65, 118 N. W. 726.

Missouri. Nat. Bk. of Commerce in St. Louis v. Morris (1911), 156 Mo. App. 43, 135 S. W. 1008; State Bk. of Freeport v. Cape Girardeau & C. R. Co. (1913), 155 S. W. 1111; Central Bank of Columbia v. Lyda (1917), 191 S. W. 245.

North Carolina.- Brooks v. Sulli

van (1901), 129 N. Car. 190, 39 S. E. 822; Citizens & Marine Bk. of Newport News v. Southern R. W. (1910), 153 N. Car. 346; J. L. Smathers & Co. v. Toxaway Hotel Co. (1913), 78 S. E. 224.

North Dakota.- Shuman v. Citizen's State Bk. of Rugby (1914), 147 N. W. 388.

Oregon.-Bailey v. Inland Empire Co. (1915), 146 Pac. 991.

Tennessee.-First Nat. Bk. of Elgin, Ill. v. Russell (1911), 139 S. W. 734.

Utah.- Felt v. Bush (1912), 126 Pac. 688.

Virginia. Payne v. Zell (1900), 98 Va. 294, 36 S. E. 379.

Washington.- Bk. of Montreal v. Howard (1906), 44 Wash. 10, 86 Pac. 1115; Hillman V. Stanley (1909), 56 Wash. 320, 105 Pac. 816; German-Am. Bank of Seattle V. Wright (1915), 148 Pac. 769; Crewdson v. Shultz (1919), 254 Fed.

24.

Wyoming. George V. Emery (1909), 18 Wyo. 352, 107 Pac. 1.

United States.- Trust Co. of St. Louis Co. v. Markee (1910), 179 Fed. 764.

Section 28. Absence or failure of consideration is matter of defense as against any person not a holder in due course; and partial failure of consideration is a defense pro tanto, whether the failure is an ascertained and liquidated amount or otherwise.

Alabama. United Brothers of Friendship & Sisters of Mysterious Ten v. C. S. Huffman Auditing Co. (1918), 78 So. 864; Conwell v. Rice (1919), 80 So. 406. Arizona. Hurley (1916), 156 Pac. 83.

7. Wilky

Arkansas. Williamson v. Miles

(1914), 169 S. W. 368; Ozark Diamond Mines Co. v. Townes (1915), 174 S. W. 515; Haglin v. Friedman (1915), 177 S. W. 429; Hamburg v. Ahrens (1915), 177 S. W. 14; Dodd v. Axle Nut Sigh Co. (1916), 189 S. W. 663.

Connecticut. St. Paul's Episco

« ÎnapoiContinuă »