Imagini ale paginilor
PDF
ePub

TABLE 10.-Institutional quota fulfillments by the feeble-minded-Comparative findings from four different standards or analysis methods-Continued.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

TABLE 11.-Institutional quota fulfillments by the insane-Comparative findings from three different standards or analysis methods

[blocks in formation]

TABLE 11.-Institutional quota fulfillments by the insane-Comparative findings from three different standards or analysis methods-Continued

c. Age limits: All persons in the reporting State and Federal institutions for the insane are included. Source of data: 94 State and Federal institutions for the insane.1

Where located: Same as listed on page 780, "Analysis of America's Modern Melting Pot," hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, House of Representatives, November 21, 1922. Date of returns: January 1, 1921-March 31, 1922.

Analysis method a: The inmate frequency of the insane in the whole population equals 100 per cent quota fulfillment; method used in the "Melting Pot" analysis.

Analysis method b: The inmate frequency of the insane in the whole population over 20 years of age equals 100 per cent quota fulfillment.

Analysis method c: The inmate frequency of the insane in the whole population over 40 years of age equals 100 per cent quota fulfillment.

[blocks in formation]

1 The different analyses in this table were secured from first-hand returns supplied by the authorities in charge of the several institutions reporting. These returns were made directly to the expert eugenics agent of the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization of the House of Representatives. The number and location of the institutions reporting data for this table, and those of the same class that did not make returns, are listed on page 780 of the Analysis of America's Modern Melting Pot, hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, House of Representatives, Sixty-seventh Congress, third session, Nov. 21, 1922.

? Population records from the United States census of 1910.

3 The per cent allotment is found by dividing the population of the particular nativity group by the whole population used in the group or groups taken as the standard, and multiplying the result by 100. The number expected is found by multiplying the per cent allotment by the total number found in institutions in the particular group and dividing the product by 100.

These numbers are found by the actual survey and of course do not vary with different methods of analysis. 6 This per cent distribution is found by dividing the number of the particular group found in institutions by the number in institutions found in the group or groups representing the standard, and multiplying the result by 100.

This quota fulfillment by numbers is found by subtracting the number expected from the number found. 8 The quota fulfillment by per cent is found by dividing the number found by the number expected and multiplying the quotient by 100.

TABLE 11.-Institutional quota fulfillments by the insane-Comparative findings from three different standards or analysis methods-Continued

[blocks in formation]

TABLE 12.-Institutional quota fulfillments by the adult criminalistic group-Comparative findings from three different standards or analysis methods"

[blocks in formation]

Where located: Same as listed on page 796, "Analysis of America's Modern Melting Pot," hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, House of Representatives, November 21, 1922. Date of returns: January 1, 1921-March 31, 1922.

Analysis method a: The inmate frequency of adult criminals in the whole population equals 100 per cent quota fulfillment; method used in the "Melting Pot Analysis."

Analysis method b: The inmate frequency of adult criminals in the whole population over 20 years of age equals 100 per cent quota fulfillment.

Analysis method c: The inmate frequency of adult criminals in the whole population over 20 years of age, minus the negroes, equals 100 per cent quota fulfillment.

[blocks in formation]

(a) Analysis method a; standard,
whole population..

91, 972, 266

[blocks in formation]

(b) Analysis method b; standard, whole population over 20 years of age.. 53, 409, 527 (c) Analysis method c; standard, whole population over 20 years of age, minus negroes.. 2. Native white, both parents native born: (a) Analysis method a; standard, whole population.. (b) Analysis method b; standard, whole population over 20 years of age.. 26, 667, 940 (c) Analysis method c; standard, whole population over 20 years of age, minus negroes..

[blocks in formation]

48, 307, 287

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

49, 488, 575

[blocks in formation]

26, 667, 940

[blocks in formation]

1 In the institutional returns it was learned that adult criminals vary officially in different States from ages above 18 years to ages above 21 years. The average appears to be about 20 years. This is also a convenient census age-grouping, so that these returns are analyzed on the basis of institutional inmates rated in their particular States as adult criminals, and of the census reports of populations above 20 years of age. 2 The different analyses in this table were secured from first-hand returns supplied by the authorities in charge of the several institutions reporting. These returns were made directly to the expert eugenics agent of the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization of the House of Representatives. The number and location of each of the institutions reporting data for this table, and those of the same class which did not make returns, are listed on page 796 of the Analysis of America's Modern Melting Pot, hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, House of Representatives, Sixty-seventh Congress, third session, November 21, 1922.

Population records from the United States Census of 1910.

The per cent allotment is found by dividing the population of the particular nativity group by the whole population used in the group or groups taken as the standard, and multiplying the result by 100. The number expected is found by multiplying the per cent allotment by the total number found in institutions in the particular group, and dividing the product by 100.

These numbers are found by the actual survey, and of course do not vary with different methods of analysis.

7 This per cent distribution is found by dividing the number of the particular group found in institutions by the number in institutions found in the group or groups representing the standard, and multiplying the result by 100.

This quota fulfillment by numbers is found by subtracting the number expected from the number found.

The quota fulfillment by per cent is found by dividing the number found by the number expected, and multiplying the product by 100.

TABLE 12.-Institutional quota fulfillments by the adult criminalistic group- -Comparative findings from three different standards or analysis methods-Con.

[blocks in formation]

6 Foreign-born white:

79.88 -3,529

88.44

(a) Analysis method a; standard, whole population. (b) Analysis method b; standard, whole population over 20 years of age... (c) Analysis method c; standard, whole population over 20 years of age, mínus negroes. 7. Total foreign white stock (3, 4, and 6): (a) Analysis method a; standard, whole population. (b) Analysis method b; standard, whole population over 20 years of age... (c) Analysis method c; standard, whole population over 20 years of age, minus negroes.

[blocks in formation]

8. Negro (all parentage):

44. 26 18, 062 14, 802

43.79-3, 260

81.95

[blocks in formation]

(a) Analysis method a; standard, whole population.

[blocks in formation]

of age...

(c) Analysis method c; standard,
whole population over 20 years
of age, minus negroes..

[blocks in formation]
« ÎnapoiContinuă »