INJUNCTION. See also Jurisdiction, IV, 1-3.
Federal court injunction-State court proceedings-Price Control
Act.-Under § 205 of Price Control Act, federal court may stay evic-
tion order of state court notwithstanding Judicial Code § 265. Porter
v. Dicken, 252.
INNS. See Constitutional Law, X, 3; XI, 2.
INSANITY. See Criminal Law, 1.
INSOLVENCY. See Bankruptcy; Taxation, 1.
INSPECTION. See Constitutional Law, VI, 2.
INSTRUCTIONS TO JURY. See Criminal Law, 1, 5–6.
INSURANCE. See Constitutional Law, III, 3–4; IX, 6–7; X, 1–2;
XI, 1.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE. See Antitrust Acts; Constitutional
Law, IX, 1–7; Criminal Law, 2; Jurisdiction, IV, 1; Labor, 1–7;
Public Utilities; Securities; Transportation; Unfair Competi-
tion.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT. See Bankruptcy, 1–3; Criminal
Law, 2; Jurisdiction, IV, 1; Transportation.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. See Bankruptcy,
1-3; Jurisdiction, IV, 1; Transportation.
INTERVENORS. See Jurisdiction, I, 2; III.
INVESTIGATION. See Costs.
INVESTMENT CONTRACTS. See Securities.
JOINDER. See Criminal Law, 5.
JONES ACT. See Admiralty, 2-3; Labor, 5-6.
JUDGES. See Constitutional Law, IV, 1–2; V.
JUDGMENTS. See Aliens, 3; Costs; Price Control, 3.
JUDICIARY. See Constitutional Law, IV, 1-2; V; Jurisdiction,
I, 3; II, 6.
JUDICIAL POWER. See Constitutional Law, IV, 1-2; V; Juris-
diction.
JURISDICTION. See also Bankruptcy, 1-3; Constitutional Law,
I, 1-2; II, 2; IV, 1-2; X, 4; Contracts, 2; Criminal Law, 7.
I. In General, p. 897.
II. Supreme Court, p. 897.
III. Circuit Courts of Appeals, p. 898.
IV. District Courts, p. 898.
V. Court of Claims, p. 898.
References to particular subjects under title Jurisdiction.-Admi-
ralty, I, 1; Appeal, 1, 2; II, 1, 5; III; Assignment of Error, II, 2;
Certiorari, II, 3; Collective Bargaining, I, 2; III; Concurrent Find-
ings, II, 4; Constitution, II, 6; V, 1; Criminal Appeals Act, II, 1;
Demurrer, II, 1; District of Columbia, II, 2; Easement, V, 1-2;
Eminent Domain, V, 1-2; Eviction, I, 3; IV, 2-3; Federal Question,
II, 5-8; Finality of Judgment, II, 5; Findings, II, 4; V, 2; Habeas
Corpus, II, 7; Indictment, II, 1; Injunction, IV, 1-3; Interstate
Commerce Commission, IV, 1; Just Compensation, V, 1-2; Landlord
and Tenant, I, 3; IV, 2-4; Local Law, II, 7-9; Moot Case, I, 3;
Price Administrator, I, 3; IV, 2-4; Price Control Act, I, 3; IV, 2-4;
Rent Control, I, 3; IV, 2-4; Restitution, IV, 4; Selective Service Act,
II, 1; Seniority, I, 2; Statute of Limitations, II, 8; Stay, IV, 2-3;
Taxation, II, 9; Three-Judge Court, IV, 1; Unions, I, 2; III; Venue,
II, 1; Veterans, I, 2.
1. Admiralty jurisdiction.-Right peculiar to admiralty may be
enforced also on law side. Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki, 85.
2. Appealable interest.-Union as having appealable interest in
judgment in suit by veteran claiming seniority rights against employer
with whom union has collective bargaining agreement. Fishgold v.
Sullivan Drydock Corp., 275.
3. Moot case-Price Control Act-Enforcement.-Eviction of ten-
ant by state court did not render moot appeal by Price Administrator
in proceeding in federal court to enjoin eviction. Porter v. Lee, 246.
II. Supreme Court.
1. Criminal Appeals Act.-Judgment of District Court sustaining
demurrer to indictment under § 11 of Selective Service Act on ground
of improper venue, appealable directly to this Court. U. S. v.
Anderson, 699.
2. Criminal cases from District of Columbia.-Material error in
capital case from District of Columbia cognizable though not specifi-
cally challenged. Fisher v. U. S., 463.
3. Certiorari.-Court may not adjudge rights or liabilities of per-
sons neither named as respondents nor served in accordance with
Rules. Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki, 85.
4. Concurrent findings.-Concurrent findings of two lower courts
not conclusive in denaturalization proceeding. Knauer v. U. S., 654.
5. Review of state courts-Finality of judgment.-Orders denying
claim of federal right which were not appealable to higher state court,
reviewable here. Woods v. Nierstheimer, 211.
6. Review of state court-Constitutional questions.-Function of
this Court in determination of questions arising under Federal Consti-
tution; effect of state court decision. Pennekamp v. Florida, 331.
7. Review of state courts-Federal question.-Denials of habeas
corpus as based on adequate nonfederal ground. Woods v. Niers-
theimer, 211.
8. Id.-Effect of fact that statute of limitations on proper remedy
under state law has expired. Id.
9. Review of state courts-Questions of local law.-Interpretation
of state tax statute by highest court of State binding here.
struction Finance Corporation v. Beaver County, 204.
III. Circuit Courts of Appeals.
Review of District Court-Appealable interest.-Union as having
appealable interest in judgment in suit by veteran claiming seniority
rights against employer with whom union has collective bargaining
agreement. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock Corp., 275.
1. Three-judge court-Review of Interstate Commerce Commis-
sion.-Action of Commission finding allowance to shipper in excess
of rental for use of cars unlawful was "order" which 3-judge court had
jurisdiction to set aside. El Dorado Oil Works v. U. S., 12.
2. Price Control Act-Enforcement-Injunction.-District Court
has jurisdiction of suit by Price Administrator to enjoin eviction of
tenant though eviction proceeding pending in state court. Porter v.
Lee, 246; Porter v. Dicken, 252.
3. Id.-Under § 205 of Price Control Act, District Court may stay
eviction order of state court notwithstanding Judicial Code § 265.
Porter v. Dicken, 252.
4. Price Control Act-Enforcement-Restitution.-Court has
power to order restitution of rents collected by landlord in excess of
maximums established under Act. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.,
395.
1. Claim founded on Constitution-Taking of property for public
use.-Claim of compensation for easement over land taken by fre-
quent and regular flights of military aircraft at low altitudes was
within jurisdiction. U. S. v. Causby, 256.
2. Findings-Sufficiency.-Insufficiency of findings as to nature and
duration of easement taken by Government. Id.
JURY. See also Criminal Law, 1, 5–6.
1. Selection of jury-Discrimination-Federal courts.-Jury panel
from which persons who work for daily wage were intentionally and
systematically excluded and unlawfully constituted. Thiel v. Southern
Pacific Co., 217.
2. Id. Judgment of District Court in which jury panel was unlaw-
fully constituted reversed by this Court in exercise of power of super-
vision over administration of justice in federal courts. Id.
JUST COMPENSATION. See Constitutional Law, VIII; Jurisdic-
tion, V, 1-2.
JUSTICIABLE QUESTIONS. See Constitutional Law, IV, 1.
LABOR. See also Jurisdiction, I, 2; III; Jury, 1; Veterans.
1. Fair Labor Standards Act-Coverage-Production for com-
merce.-Burden of proof of whether employees are engaged in "pro-
duction of goods for commerce." Schulte Co. v. Gangi, 108.
2. Fair Labor Standards Act-Coverage-Maintenance
ployees. Act applicable to maintenance employees of building whose
occupants work on goods owned by non-occupants who ship in inter-
state commerce. Schulte Co. v. Gangi, 108.
3. Fair Labor Standards Act-Workweek-What
work. Time spent walking to work on employer's premises; activities
preliminary to productive work; applicability of de minimis rule;
burden of proof; time-clock records. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens
Pottery Co., 680.
4. Fair Labor Standards Act-Liability of employer-Liquidated
damages. Employer not relieved from liability for liquidated dam-
ages by compromise or settlement of bona fide dispute as to coverage
of Act. Schulte Co. v. Gangi, 108.
5. Seamen-Injuries-Remedy.-Seaman injured on ship owned by
United States had right of action under Jones Act against operating
agent. Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 707.
6. Longshoremen-Personal injuries-Jones Act.-Longshoreman
injured on pier by raft falling from vessel which he was loading, with-
out right of recovery under Jones Act; effect of Longshoremen's &
Harbor Workers' Act. Swanson v. Marra Bros., 1.
7. Longshoremen-Personal injuries-Liability of shipowner.-Lia-
bility of owner for unseaworthiness extends to stevedore, in employ of
independent contractor, injured while aboard and loading ship; effect
of Longshoremen's & Harbor Workers' Act. Seas Shipping Co. v.
Sieracki, 85.
LABOR UNIONS. See Jurisdiction, I, 2; III; Labor.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. See Jurisdiction, I, 3; IV, 2-4.
LAY-OFF. See Veterans.
LEASE. See Bankruptcy, 2-3.
LEGISLATURE. See Constitutional Law, III, 1-4; Statutes, 1–2.
LICENSE. See Constitutional Law, IX, 3, 6; Public Utilities.
LIENS. See Bankruptcy, 1; Taxation, 1.
LIMITATIONS. See Constitutional Law, III, 2-4; X, 5; Jurisdic-
tion, II, 8.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. See Labor, 4.
See Constitutional Law, X, 3; XI, 2.
LONGSHOREMEN. See Admiralty, 3-4; Labor, 6-7.
LONGSHOREMEN'S & HARBOR WORKERS' ACT. See Admi-
ralty, 3-4; Labor, 6-7.
MACHINERY. See Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
MAINTENANCE. See Labor, 2.
MANUFACTORY. See Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
MARITIME LAW. See Admiralty, 1-5; Labor, 5–7.
MASS TRIALS. See Criminal Law, 5.
MASTER. See Procedure, 1.
MASTER AND SERVANT. See Admiralty, 2–5; Labor, 1–7.
MAXIMUM PRICE. See Price Control, 6.
MENTAL DEFICIENCY. See Criminal Law, 1.
MERCHANT MARINE ACT. See Admiralty, 2–3.
MILITARY AIRPLANES. See Constitutional Law, VIII; Juris-
tion, I, 2; II; V, 1.
MILITARY SERVICE. See Aliens, 2; Criminal Law, 7; Jurisdic-
tion, I, 2; II, 1; V, 1.
MINERAL LANDS. See Taxation, 2.
MONOPOLY. See Antitrust Acts; Constitutional Law, VII, 1, 3.
MOOT CASE. See Jurisdiction, I, 3; Price Control, 3.
MORTGAGES. See Bankruptcy, 1.
MOTOR CARRIERS. See Constitutional Law, I, 2; IX, 4.
MURDER. See Criminal Law, 1.
NAMES. See Unfair Competition.
|