War Law: Understanding International Law and Armed Conflict
Open Road + Grove/Atlantic, 1 dec. 2007 - 224 pagini
“Professor Byers’s book goes to the heart of some of the most bitterly contested recent controversies about the International Rule of Law.” —Chris Patten, Chancellor of Oxford University
International law governing the use of military force has been the subject of intense public debate. Under what conditions is it appropriate, or necessary, for a country to use force when diplomacy has failed? Michael Byers, a widely known world expert on international law, weighs these issues in War Law.
Byers examines the history of armed conflict and international law through a series of case studies of past conflicts, ranging from the 1837 Caroline Incident to the abuse of detainees by US forces at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Byers explores the legal controversies that surrounded the 1999 and 2001 interventions in Kosovo and Afghanistan and the 2003 war in Iraq; the development of international humanitarian law from the 1859 Battle of Solferino to the present; and the role of war crimes tribunals and the International Criminal Court. He also considers the unique influence of the United States in the evolution of this extremely controversial area of international law.
War Law is neither a textbook nor a treatise, but a fascinating account of a highly controversial topic that is necessary reading for fans of military history and general readers alike.
“Should be read, and pondered, by those who are seriously concerned with the legacy we will leave to future generations.” —Noam Chomsky
Ce spun oamenii - Scrie o recenzie
Recenziile nu sunt verificate, dar Google caută conținutul fals și îl elimină atunci când îl identifică
WAR LAW: Understanding International Law and Armed ConflictComentariu Utilizator - Kirkus
If Britain suspected that a Boston bar harbored IRA terrorists, would it be justified in lobbing cruise missiles into the city? Canadian legal scholar Byers doesn't raise the question, but he achieves ... Citește recenzia completă
Implied Authorization and Intentional Ambiguity
Inherent Right of Selfdefence
Responsibility to Protect
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
accepted accordance action Administration adopted agencies agreement American argument armed Article Assembly attack authorization bombs Britain British Bush Chapter VII civilians claim committed concerned considered constituted countries Court crimes customary international law Darfur decision defence determine economic established force foreign former further human rights humanitarian intervention individual International Criminal international humanitarian law international peace interpretation invasion involved Iraq Iraqi Israel Justice justify killed Kosovo matters means measures military necessary operation Organization Panama parties peace and security political possible pre-emptive present Charter President principle prisoners prohibition protect question referred regard regional relations remain resolution respect responsibility result rules Secretary Security Council resolutions self-defence September situation Social soldiers taken territory terrorism terrorist threat tion treaty tribunals trusteeship UN Security Council unilateral United Nations University Press violations vote war law weapons