Imagini ale paginilor
PDF
ePub

Budget

THE JUDICIARY

appendix

page Heading

43 Salaries of Supporting Personnel..
44 Fees of Jurors and Commissioners.

(Delete the heading and entire paragraph under this
heading and insert in lieu thereof the following:)
Fees of JuroTS

For fees, expenses, and costs of jurors; and compen-
sation of jury commissioners: [fees of United States
commissioners and other committing magistrates
acting under title 18, United States Code, section
3041; $15,000,000 $14,950,000.

47 Salaries and Expenses of United States Magistrates.
(Insert at the end of the paragraph under this heading
the following proviso:)

: Provided, That this appropriation shall be available
for fees of United States commissioners.

[blocks in formation]

As required by law, these requests for the judiciary are submitted without change.

I recommend that these proposals be transmitted to the Congress. Respectfully yours,

JAMES R. SCHLESINGER, Acting Director.

[ocr errors]

(No appeal letters)

Office of the Marshal
Supreme Court of the United States
Washington, D. Q. 20543

The Honorable John L. McClellan, Chairman
Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations
for the Departments of State, Justice, and
Commerce, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies
United States Senate

Washington, D. C. 20510

Dear Senator McClellan:

The Court has requested that I advise you that no appeal is contemplated regarding the level of funding for Fiscal Year 1971 as recommended in the House Report submitted by the Committee on Appropriations on May 12, 1970, and that it accepts the same as reported.

Sincerely yours,

T. Perry Lippitt

Marshal

Re: Hou

[blocks in formation]

Appropriations Report, rendered May 12, 1970,
for the 1971 Annual Appropriations Bill

[blocks in formation]

you that the ortion of the subject report which concerns

the amount provided for the salaries and expenses of this

Court has been reviewed and the amount allowed is acceptable.
Accordingly, the concurrence of your Committee

[blocks in formation]

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES COURTS

Dear Senator McClellan:

At the direction and with the approval of the Budget Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States, I am pleased to inform you that the amounts included in the Judiciary Appropriation Bill, 1971 (H.R. 17575) for the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, the Court of Claims, and under the heading "Courts of Appeals, District Courts, and Other Judicial Services" meet our approval and that we do not intend to appeal for the restoration of funds denied by the House. The Honorable Alfred P. Murrah, Director of the Federal Judicial Center, also has expressed his approval of the sum included in the Bill for the Center and has asked me to inform you that he has no intention of filing an appeal.

We do respectfully request that your Committee consider the proposed amendments contained in Senate Document No. 91-69. These amendments, which provide for a net increase in budget authority for the Judiciary of $4,220,000, are required for full conversion to the magistrates system pursuant to the Act of October 17, 1968, Public Law 90-578. The original estimate for "Salaries and Expenses of United States Magistrates" provided only for a pilot program. The Judicial Conference, at its meeting on March 16 and 17, 1970, in light of recommendations of the Director of the Administrative Office, the District Courts and the Circuit Councils, determined the number of magistrates, the locations at which they shall serve, and their respective salaries. The revised requests which are based on those recommendations were submitted to the Bureau of the Budget on March 23, 1970. Justifications in support thereof have been furnished your Committee.

Enclosed are statements reflecting in detail for each appro-
priation (except the Supreme Court) the administrative
allocation of the House allowances. Also enclosed, for your
convenient reference, are excerpts from the report of the
House Appropriations Committee (No. 91-1072). We shall
welcome an opportunity to appear before your Committee to
testify in support of our requirements and in support of
the proposed amendments.

Sincerely,

Enclosures

William R. Sweeney

Object Classification

1970 Appropriation1

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF THE APPROPRIATION FOR 1970, THE BUDGET ESTIMATE AND HOUSE ALLOWANCE FOR 1971

Salaries and Expenses, Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
« ÎnapoiContinuă »