Can God and Caesar Coexist?: Balancing Religious Freedom and International LawYale University Press, 1 ian. 2004 - 266 pagini Bruce Ackerman and James Fishkin argue that Americans can revitalize their democracy and break the cycle of cynical media manipulation that is crippling public life. They propose a new national holiday - Deliberation Day - for each presidential election year. On this day people throughout the country will meet in public spaces and engage in structured debates about issues that divide the candidates in the upcoming presidential election. Deliberation Day is a bold new proposal, but it builds on a host of smaller experiments. Over the past decade, Fishkin has initiated Deliberative Polling events in the United States and elsewhere that bring random and representative samples of voters together for discussion of key political issues. In these events, participants greatly increase their understanding of the issues and often change their minds on the best course of action. Deliberation Day is not merely a novel idea but a feasible reform. Ackerman and Fishkin consider the economic, organisational, and political questions raised by their proposal and explore its relationship to the larger ideals of liberal democracy. |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 1 - 3 din 3
Pagina
Balancing Religious Freedom and International Law Robert F. Drinan. tions for an end to wars and discrimination based on religious differences. The Oslo statement is a cry from the heart for the love and peace mandated by every religion ...
Balancing Religious Freedom and International Law Robert F. Drinan. tions for an end to wars and discrimination based on religious differences. The Oslo statement is a cry from the heart for the love and peace mandated by every religion ...
Pagina
Ți-ai atins limita de vizualizări pentru această carte.
Ți-ai atins limita de vizualizări pentru această carte.
Pagina
Ți-ai atins limita de vizualizări pentru această carte.
Ți-ai atins limita de vizualizări pentru această carte.
Cuprins
Religious Freedom and the European Court of Human Rights | |
Vatican II Vigorously Defends Religious Freedom | |
The Rights of Dissenters | |
Religious Freedom and Issues of Gender and Sexuality | |
The Peoples Republic of China and Religious Freedom | |
Religious Freedom and the Muslim World | |
The Worlds Jewish Community and Religious Freedom | |
Questions of God and Caesar | |
Appendix A United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief 1981 | |
Appendix B Vatican II Statement on the Jews | |
Selected Bibliography | |
Index | |
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Can God and Caesar Coexist?: Balancing Religious Freedom and International Law Robert F. Drinan Previzualizare limitată - 2005 |
Can God and Caesar Coexist?: Balancing Religious Freedom and International Law Robert F. Drinan Previzualizare limitată - 2004 |
Can God & Caesar Coexist?: Balancing Religious Freedom and International Law Robert F. Drinan Nu există previzualizare disponibilă - 2004 |
Termeni și expresii frecvente
accepted actions activities allow anti-Semitism authority become bodies Catholic centuries China Christians Church citizens claim clear clearly Commission committee concept conscience continue convictions Council countries Court covenant created culture Declaration on Religious denied developed discrimination documents ECHR effective efforts equality established Europe European example exercise existence fact faith feel follow force gious give global guarantee human rights idea individuals international law Islamic Israel issue Jewish Jews leaders least major means ment million moral Muslim never nonbelievers objectives observers organizations parents persecution persons political position practice principles protection provides question reasons recognized reli religion or belief religious free religious freedom religious groups respect result right to religious ruling schools secular seek seems society status teaching tions traditional tribunal United Nations Vatican views violation women