Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political DebateRowman & Littlefield, 1997 - 180 pagini This vigorous debate between two distinguished philosophers presents two views on a topic of worldwide importance: the role of religion in politics. Audi argues that citizens in a free democracy should distinguish religious and secular considerations and give them separate though related roles. Wolterstorff argues that religious elements are both appropriate in politics and indispensable to the vitality of a pluralistic democracy. Each philosopher first states his position in detail, then responds to and criticizes the opposing viewpoint. Written with engaging clarity, Religion in the Public Square will spur discussion among scholars, students, and citizens. |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 1 - 5 din 43
Pagina 10
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Pagina 11
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Pagina 12
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Pagina 16
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Pagina 17
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Ne pare rău, conținutul acestei pagini este restricționat.
Cuprins
LIBERAL DEMOCRACY AND THE PLACE OF RELIGION IN POLITICS Robert Audi | 1 |
Separation of Church and State as Addressed to the State | 3 |
The libertarian principle | 4 |
The equalitarian principle | 5 |
The neutrality principle | 6 |
Religious Obligation and Political Conduct | 9 |
Grounds and dimensions of religious obligation | 10 |
The mutual independence of religious sources of obligation | 12 |
Rawlss Version of the Liberal Position | 90 |
Rawlss Attempt to Identify the Independent Source | 96 |
Does the Source Yield the Principles Needed? | 102 |
Is It Fair to Ask Everyone to Use the Source? | 104 |
Rawlss Rationale | 105 |
What Does Respect Require? | 109 |
No Restraint on Religious Reasons | 111 |
Do We Need Consensus? | 113 |
Connections among religious and secular sources | 13 |
Civic Virtue and Religious Conviction | 16 |
Civic virtue religious commitment and moral obligation | 17 |
Theoethical equilibrium | 21 |
Some Principles and Practices of Civic Virtue | 24 |
Secular rationale | 25 |
Secular motivation | 28 |
Civic voice | 34 |
The mutual integration of civic and religious virtues | 35 |
principle of theoethical equilibrium | 37 |
Separation of Church and State as Addressed to the Church | 38 |
Ecclesiastical neutrality | 39 |
Clerical neutrality | 45 |
Some Problems of Application | 47 |
THE ROLE OF RELIGION IN DECISION AND DISCUSSION OF POLITICAL ISSUES Nicholas Wolterstorff | 67 |
What Is a Liberal Democracy? | 69 |
The Liberal Position | 72 |
The Ethic of the Citizen and Restraints on Reasons | 76 |
Are Religious Reasons too Dangerous to Permit? | 78 |
Lockes Version of the Liberal Position | 80 |
The Consocial Position | 114 |
Application to Public Officials | 116 |
WOLTERSTORFF ON RELIGION POLITICS AND THE LIBERAL STATE Robert Audi | 121 |
Wolterstorffs Critique of the Liberalism of Locke and Rawls | 129 |
Wolterstorffs Positive View of Religion and Politics | 139 |
AUDI ON RELIGION POLITICS AND LIBERAL DEMOCRACY Nicholas Wolterstorff | 145 |
Audis Version of the Liberal Position | 148 |
Audis Rationale | 151 |
Evaluation of the Rationale | 157 |
Audis Independent Source | 161 |
In Summary | 164 |
CLOSING COMMENTS AND REMAINING ISSUES Robert Audi | 167 |
Consensus versus Majority Preference as Democratic Standards | 168 |
The Justification of Coercion | 169 |
Liberal Democracy and Mutual Respect | 172 |
Secular Reasons and Secular Motivation | 173 |
175 | |
ABOUT THE AUTHORS | 179 |
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in ... Previzualizare limitată - 2000 |
Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in ... Robert Audi,Nicholas Wolterstorff Vizualizare fragmente - 1997 |
Termeni și expresii frecvente
accept action adequate secular reason appropriate Audi's basis beliefs civic virtue coercion comprehensive perspectives concept of liberal concerning conduct consensus consocial constitutional debate decisions and discussions democratic society endorse epistemology essay ethic evidentially adequate fallibilism free and democratic free and equal fully rational gious grounds human Idea of liberal ideal imply independent source institutions interpretation John Locke John Rawls Kent Greenawalt kind law or policy laws or public least liberal democ liberal democracy liberal position Locke major matters moral Nicholas Wolterstorff non-religious omnibenevolent one's person philosophy political decisions political issues principle of secular principles of justice proposed public policy public reason question Rawls Rawls's Reformed epistemology relevant religion religious considerations religious convictions religious group religious obligation religious reasons require restraint restrictions Robert Audi role of citizen secular motivation secular rationale Separation of Church sociopolitical theism theo-ethical equilibrium tion virtue ethics vote W. D. Ross Wolterstorff
Referințe la această carte
Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context Glen H. Stassen,David P. Gushee Nu există previzualizare disponibilă - 2003 |
Liberalism and Islam: Practical Reconciliation Between the Liberal State and ... Hamid Hadji Haidar Vizualizare fragmente - 2008 |