Australia and the Birth of the International Bill of Human Rights, 1946-1966Federation Press, 2005 - 306 pagini Australia and the Birth of the International Bill of Human Rights provides the first in depth examination of Australia's first reactions to 'international human rights' during the negotiations for the International Bill of Rights: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ICCPR and ICESCR. It follows Australian policy from 1946, the first year in which the United Nations began discussing a Bill of Rights until 1966 when the twin Covenants were finalized. The book looks at what successive Australian Governments understood by 'human rights' and how they responded to discussion of sensitive domestic topics such as: immigration policies self-determination for inhabitants of trust territories equal pay for men and women and balancing human rights and national security. As well as considering Australian policies towards substantive rights, the book looks at Australian policies towards international schemes for protecting rights including early proposals for an International Court of Human Rights and its later support for more modest, technical expertise based assistance for States, debates often taking place against the background of highly politicised issues such as the Cold War and the fight against apartheid. In looking at this 20 year period, the book demonstrates the way in which Australian policy changed substantially over time: as between Labor and Liberal administrations, between Ministers and bureaucrats and as between decision makers with markedly distinct visions of the ideal relationship between citizens and a State, and the individual State and the international community. In highlighting the diversity of views about human rights, this book thus challenges the notion that Australia has historically supported a universally understood set of human rights norms and underlines the number of variables which may be affecting ongoing implementation of human rights standards. |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 1 - 5 din 80
Pagina 19
... Spender ( December 1949 to April 1951 ) 70 Richard Casey ( April 1951 to February 1960 ) Prime Minister Robert Menzies ( February 1960 to December 1961 ) Garfield Barwick ( December 1961 to April 1964 ) • Paul Hasluck ( April 1964 to ...
... Spender ( December 1949 to April 1951 ) 70 Richard Casey ( April 1951 to February 1960 ) Prime Minister Robert Menzies ( February 1960 to December 1961 ) Garfield Barwick ( December 1961 to April 1964 ) • Paul Hasluck ( April 1964 to ...
Pagina 20
... Spender was given the External Affairs portfolio . Among inter- national lawyers , he is probably best known as having been a judge and later President of the International Court of Justice . Spender was a member of the first Menzies ...
... Spender was given the External Affairs portfolio . Among inter- national lawyers , he is probably best known as having been a judge and later President of the International Court of Justice . Spender was a member of the first Menzies ...
Pagina 21
... Spender's policies and put them into effect " .77 Casey resigned from Australian politics in 1960 , a month after becoming a life peer of the House of Lords . In 1965 , he was appointed Australian Governor - General . The ministers who ...
... Spender's policies and put them into effect " .77 Casey resigned from Australian politics in 1960 , a month after becoming a life peer of the House of Lords . In 1965 , he was appointed Australian Governor - General . The ministers who ...
Pagina 22
... Spender's contribution as Ambassador to the United States , or Casey's and Hasluck's appointments as Governor - General . - Yet , not all ministers were equally involved in policy - making . Evatt and Spender were dominant in their ...
... Spender's contribution as Ambassador to the United States , or Casey's and Hasluck's appointments as Governor - General . - Yet , not all ministers were equally involved in policy - making . Evatt and Spender were dominant in their ...
Pagina 23
... Spender period " ( 1949-1951 ) . Secondly , in order to reflect the movement from ministerial to bureaucratic control and the virtual seamlessness of policy - making in the latter years , the period of 1951– 1966 is referred to as the ...
... Spender period " ( 1949-1951 ) . Secondly , in order to reflect the movement from ministerial to bureaucratic control and the virtual seamlessness of policy - making in the latter years , the period of 1951– 1966 is referred to as the ...
Cuprins
10 | |
28 | |
36 | |
51 | |
Conclusion | 57 |
Chapter 2 | 64 |
Chapter 4 | 75 |
Conclusion | 85 |
Implementation in a federal state | 152 |
Colonial application clause | 166 |
Conclusion | 173 |
From international adjudication | 179 |
From individual to statecentric views | 200 |
Minority rights | 208 |
Responses to the Commission on Human Rights receipt | 225 |
Conclusion | 231 |
27 | 91 |
51 | 97 |
Chapter 3 | 113 |
JURISPRUDENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS | 114 |
the exceptions to the universal | 132 |
Conclusion | 140 |
Selfdetermination | 235 |
Future predictions | 247 |
The International Bill of Human Rights excerpts | 253 |
Bibliography | 280 |
98 | 295 |
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Australia and the Birth of the International Bill of Human Rights, 1946-1966 Annemarie Devereux Previzualizare limitată - 2005 |
Termeni și expresii frecvente
Aboriginal accepted accordance action adopted application approach Article Assembly Australian delegation Australian mission Australian representative authority brief bureaucrats Cablegram Chapter civil and political clause Commission on Human Committee Commonwealth concerning considered constitutional countries Court cultural debate Department of External directed discussion domestic draft economic and social effect equal Evatt existing expressed External Affairs federal freedom given groups human rights Ibid ICCPR immigration implementation included individual instance interests interpretation issue Item jurisdiction legislative limited majority matter means Memorandum Menzies Minister minorities nature negotiations noted objections obligations particular Parties Peace period persons policies political rights present Covenant Press principles proposal protection question quoted reference regarded relation reservations resolution respect response Secretary self-determination Session social rights Spender stance statement territories Third treaty United Nations University vote Whitlam