Imagini ale paginilor
PDF
ePub

The most important religious rite borrowed by Moses from the ceremonial worship of heathen gods, is Sacrifice, a barbarous device for propitiating the gods, reaching us from ages so remote that we fail to trace its origin in even the most ancient traditions; and therefore see in its irrational barbarism the superstitious terrors of primeval man, hastening with tribute from his possessions to appease the wrath and win the favour of the invisible Beings, whose voices were heard in the roar of the tempest, and from whose hands were launched the terrors of the thunderbolt.

This debased form of worship, engrafted on prehistoric religions when mankind had no perception of beneficence in God, attained its fullest development in the adoption of human sacrifice. The first victims were doubtless prisoners captured in battle; but when priests announced that the inexorable gods demanded the sacrifice of man's dearest treasures, even affectionate parents piously responded to divine cruelty by yielding up their children to the knife or the flames.

This sanguinary piety attained its most awful consummation among the Tyrians, Carthaginians, and kindred nations, who, in all great emergencies or national calamities, sacrificed the most valuable lives to appease the anger of the gods. They even periodically selected the children of the noblest families-especially only sons and daughters—to be held in reserve for immolation when the public welfare should require the propitiation of some offended deity.

When children were sacrificed to Kronus, or Molech, they were cast into the arms of an idol glowing with heat, from which they fell into a devouring furnace, and

were promptly consumed in honour of the god of light and fire. When the innocent victims were sacrificed to other gods, the unhappy parents, piously surrendering the claims of natural affection to the obligations of national religion, conducted their sons and daughters to infernal altars, where, embracing them with religious heroism, and soothing them into submission to the appalling will of the gods, they plunged a knife into their bosoms, and besmeared the hideous altars with the life-blood of theological victims.

As we consider the revolting horrors which the institution of sacrifice inflicted on the Egyptians, Phœnicians, Persians, Greeks, Gauls, Germans, Scythians, and Scandinavians, with numerous other tribes and nations, who all piously slew their children in conscientious conviction that they were performing religious duties, shall we not join with that worthy old heathen, Plutarch, in the inquiry, whether it would not have been better for mankind to have had atheists as their lawgivers, and never to have heard of gods or demons, than to have had theological rulers who taught them to secure the prosperity of their country by propitiating invisible Beings with the blood of their children? And may we not reasonably inquire, from modern believers in an infallible Bible, whether they consider it credible that an omnipotent and omniscient Deity ever adopted a religious rite common to all heathen theologies, and inevitably tending towards the abomination of human sacrifice?

In Judges xi. we read that Jephthah, an inspired judge, vowed a vow unto the Lord and said, If thou shalt without fail deliver the children of Ammon into

my hands, then it shall be that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the Lord's, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering.'

Jephthah returned in triumph from the battle, and beheld his daughter-an only child-coming forth from his house to congratulate him on his victory. There was no means of escape from the tragic consequences of this rash and fatal vow. The doomed maiden at once exclaimed, 'My father, if thou hast opened thy mouth unto the Lord, do to me according to that which hath proceeded out of thy mouth, forasmuch as the Lord hath taken vengeance for thee of thine enemies.' How deplorable the superstitious barbarism of the Hebrews, under judges declared to be divinely inspired ! This daughter of Israel believed that human sacrifices were acceptable to the national God, and that her blood was the contract price of supernatural victory over the enemy. She therefore yielded to inevitable destiny, stipulated only for two months' respite, and was then offered up as a human sacrifice to Jehovah by an inspired judge whose faith is eulogised by the apostolic author of the Epistle to the Hebrews.1

Apologetic theologians, scandalised by Hebrew fellowship with the abomination of Ashtoreth and Molech, suggest that a life of imprisoned celibacy was substituted for filiacidal sacrifice: but, if imaginative theories may thus efface the clear and obvious meaning of words, the authority of Scripture is finally lost in the universal right to modify its meaning in harmony with individual fancy. Hebrew writers, seeing the impossi

1 Heb. xi. 32.

bility of disputing the literal fulfilment of Jephthah's vow, condemn the act as illegal and displeasing to Jehovah. If therefore the Hebrew judge thus erred, why did not an inspiring dream—a voice from heaven -the angel Gabriel, arrest the sacrilegious hand of Jephthah, and announce Jehovah's abhorrence of Molech's favourite rite? In the next chapter but one, the angel of the Lord appeared twice to the wife of Manoah to prescribe a prudent regimen in pregnancy; and conversed so familarly with both husband and wife that Manoah invited him to a feast. If, therefore, celestial visitants attended to these trivialities in human affairs, how marvellous that not one of the Heavenly Host appeared to snatch the daughter of Jephthah from the flames, and vindicate the national God from the homicidal tastes of rival deities!

Who therefore can question the pernicious tendency of a ritualism of blood? Tradition depicts the brazen statue of Molech, the national deity of the Ammonites, set up within the last of a suite of seven chapels. The first was thrown open to worshippers of the god for an offering of fine flour; the second for a pair of turtle doves; the third for a lamb; the fourth for a ram; the fifth for a calf; the sixth for an ox; and the seventh for the worshipper's own child. Thus was piety measured by barbarians bowing down before a brazen image; first the fruits of the earth, then a graduated tribute of blood, culminating in human sacrifice as the highest form of human worship. If, therefore, the ancient Hebrews found no divergence in the sacrificial views of Jehovah and Molech until reaching the door of the seventh chapel, were they not liable to assume that the

blood of their children might also be acceptable to their own deity, or that there was no great impropriety in dividing their allegiance with gods who had established so much uniformity in their religion?

[ocr errors]

We can imagine the perplexity of Solomon when his numerous foreign wives, urgent for permission to worship their national deities, tearfully or scornfully inquired: What is the difference between your God and ours, seeing that all delight in the spilling of blood?' If the lurid spectre of human sacrifice ever caused Solomon to repent of liberal concessions to his domestic circle, we wonder that so wise a man did not discourage the abominations of Molech and Ashtoreth by the final abolition of a ritualism of blood.

[ocr errors]

It was, however, reserved for the lofty genius of Isaiah, or rather the Great Unknown' who spoke in his name, to detect and expose the barbarism of Mosaic ritualism; and his eloquent denunciation of propitiatory butchery attains a sublimity which commands the admiration of posterity. To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the Lord. I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he-goats. When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts? Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting. Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me, I am weary to bear them. And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea,

« ÎnapoiContinuă »