Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral PerspectivesOxford University Press, 1997 - 168 pagini In this book, Michael Perry addresses several fundamental questions about the proper role of religion in the politics of a liberal democracy, which is a central, recurring issue in the politics of the United States. The controversy about religion in politics comprises both constitutional and moral questions. According to the constitutional law of the United States, government may not "establish" religion. Given this "nonestablishment" requirement, what role (if any) is it constitutionally permissible for religion to play in the politics of the United States? Does a legislator or other public official, or even an ordinary citizen, violate the nonestablishment requirement by presenting a religious argument in public debate about what political choice to make? Not every liberal democracy is constitutionally committed to an ideal of nonestablishment. Even in the absence of such a constitutional requirement, however, fundamental political-moral questions remain. Is it morally appropriate for citizens - in particular, legislators and other public officials - to present religious arguments about the morality of human conduct in public political debate? Is it morally appropriate for them to rely on such arguments in making a political choice? In addressing these and other questions, Perry criticizes recent work by Kent Greenawalt, John Rawls, and John Finnis. |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 1 - 3 din 40
Pagina 40
... tion , exclusion , restriction or preference based on religion or belief and having as its purpose or as its effect nullification or impairment of the recognition , enjoyment or exercise of human rights and fundamental free- doms on an ...
... tion , exclusion , restriction or preference based on religion or belief and having as its purpose or as its effect nullification or impairment of the recognition , enjoyment or exercise of human rights and fundamental free- doms on an ...
Pagina 74
... tion is what is the will of God and not what is human flourishing or human nature . " 39 But given two assumptions that few Christians would want to deny , the distinction between doing " what God wills us to do " and doing " what is ...
... tion is what is the will of God and not what is human flourishing or human nature . " 39 But given two assumptions that few Christians would want to deny , the distinction between doing " what God wills us to do " and doing " what is ...
Pagina 119
... tion , unlike the exemption for the religious use of wine , would seriously com- promise an important public interest ? After all , unless the state can make that showing , the rebuttable inference stands that the failure to exempt is a ...
... tion , unlike the exemption for the religious use of wine , would seriously com- promise an important public interest ? After all , unless the state can make that showing , the rebuttable inference stands that the failure to exempt is a ...
Cuprins
Introduction Religion in Politics | 3 |
One The Constitutional Law of Religious Freedom | 9 |
Free Exercise Nonestablishment and the Problem | 25 |
Drept de autor | |
4 alte secțiuni nu sunt arătate
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives Michael J. Perry Previzualizare limitată - 1997 |
Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives Michael J. Perry Previzualizare limitată - 1999 |
Termeni și expresii frecvente
abortion accommodation position American arguments in public based moral arguments Catholic chapter Chicago L Christian Church citizens claim coercive political choice conduct is immoral constitutional law constitutionally controversial Court David Tracy deliberately contracepted discourse Establishment Clause exercise of religion Finnis Finnis's Fourteenth Amendment free exercise norm freedom of religion fundamental gious heterosexual homosexual sexual conduct human conduct Human Rights human well-being ideal of public John Finnis John Rawls Kent Greenawalt legislators liberal democracy lifelong marriage ment monogamous morality of human nonestablishment norm norm forbids government Perry persons persuasive secular argument plausible secular rationale premises presenting religious arguments principle proper role public officials public political debate public reason question Rawls Rawls's relationship of faithful relevant religion in politics religion or belief religious believers religious practice religiously based moral rely requirements of human role of religion Ronald Dworkin sacred supports the choice tion underdeterminacy United violate the nonestablishment