Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral PerspectivesOxford University Press, 1997 - 168 pagini In this book, Michael Perry addresses several fundamental questions about the proper role of religion in the politics of a liberal democracy, which is a central, recurring issue in the politics of the United States. The controversy about religion in politics comprises both constitutional and moral questions. According to the constitutional law of the United States, government may not "establish" religion. Given this "nonestablishment" requirement, what role (if any) is it constitutionally permissible for religion to play in the politics of the United States? Does a legislator or other public official, or even an ordinary citizen, violate the nonestablishment requirement by presenting a religious argument in public debate about what political choice to make? Not every liberal democracy is constitutionally committed to an ideal of nonestablishment. Even in the absence of such a constitutional requirement, however, fundamental political-moral questions remain. Is it morally appropriate for citizens - in particular, legislators and other public officials - to present religious arguments about the morality of human conduct in public political debate? Is it morally appropriate for them to rely on such arguments in making a political choice? In addressing these and other questions, Perry criticizes recent work by Kent Greenawalt, John Rawls, and John Finnis. |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 1 - 3 din 16
Pagina 15
... activity , or will of God — government may not take any action based on the view that the preferred tenet or tenets are truer or more authentically American or otherwise better than one or more competing religious or nonreligious tenets ...
... activity , or will of God — government may not take any action based on the view that the preferred tenet or tenets are truer or more authentically American or otherwise better than one or more competing religious or nonreligious tenets ...
Pagina 24
... activity that one happens not to endorse but that , nonetheless , one cannot reasonably believe to be immoral - for ... activity does not mean that it is right for government to discriminate against the activity , any more than that it ...
... activity that one happens not to endorse but that , nonetheless , one cannot reasonably believe to be immoral - for ... activity does not mean that it is right for government to discriminate against the activity , any more than that it ...
Pagina 129
... activity , there might nonetheless be good reasons for persons not to engage ( or to engage ) in the activity . There is much in Greenawalt's thoughtful book with which I am in sub- stantial agreement and on which I do not comment here ...
... activity , there might nonetheless be good reasons for persons not to engage ( or to engage ) in the activity . There is much in Greenawalt's thoughtful book with which I am in sub- stantial agreement and on which I do not comment here ...
Cuprins
Introduction Religion in Politics | 3 |
One The Constitutional Law of Religious Freedom | 9 |
Free Exercise Nonestablishment and the Problem | 25 |
Drept de autor | |
4 alte secțiuni nu sunt arătate
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives Michael J. Perry Previzualizare limitată - 1997 |
Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives Michael J. Perry Previzualizare limitată - 1999 |
Termeni și expresii frecvente
abortion accommodation position American arguments in public based moral arguments Catholic chapter Chicago L Christian Church citizens claim coercive political choice conduct is immoral constitutional law constitutionally controversial Court David Tracy deliberately contracepted discourse Establishment Clause exercise of religion Finnis Finnis's Fourteenth Amendment free exercise norm freedom of religion fundamental gious heterosexual homosexual sexual conduct human conduct Human Rights human well-being ideal of public John Finnis John Rawls Kent Greenawalt legislators liberal democracy lifelong marriage ment monogamous morality of human nonestablishment norm norm forbids government Perry persons persuasive secular argument plausible secular rationale premises presenting religious arguments principle proper role public officials public political debate public reason question Rawls Rawls's relationship of faithful relevant religion in politics religion or belief religious believers religious practice religiously based moral rely requirements of human role of religion Ronald Dworkin sacred supports the choice tion underdeterminacy United violate the nonestablishment