Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral PerspectivesOxford University Press, 1997 - 168 pagini In this book, Michael Perry addresses several fundamental questions about the proper role of religion in the politics of a liberal democracy, which is a central, recurring issue in the politics of the United States. The controversy about religion in politics comprises both constitutional and moral questions. According to the constitutional law of the United States, government may not "establish" religion. Given this "nonestablishment" requirement, what role (if any) is it constitutionally permissible for religion to play in the politics of the United States? Does a legislator or other public official, or even an ordinary citizen, violate the nonestablishment requirement by presenting a religious argument in public debate about what political choice to make? Not every liberal democracy is constitutionally committed to an ideal of nonestablishment. Even in the absence of such a constitutional requirement, however, fundamental political-moral questions remain. Is it morally appropriate for citizens - in particular, legislators and other public officials - to present religious arguments about the morality of human conduct in public political debate? Is it morally appropriate for them to rely on such arguments in making a political choice? In addressing these and other questions, Perry criticizes recent work by Kent Greenawalt, John Rawls, and John Finnis. |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 1 - 3 din 20
Pagina 89
... Finnis's point as applied to " deliberately contracepted " heterosexual conduct has good rea- son to be skeptical that Finnis's point as applied to homosexual sexual conduct has any firmer grounding in experience . There is an ...
... Finnis's point as applied to " deliberately contracepted " heterosexual conduct has good rea- son to be skeptical that Finnis's point as applied to homosexual sexual conduct has any firmer grounding in experience . There is an ...
Pagina 92
... Finnis's judgment / emotion opposition ( " [ r ] eality is known in judg- ment , not in emotion " ) is simplistic and misleading . Sometimes an emo- tional response can impede one's reaching a sound judgment ; sometimes , however , an ...
... Finnis's judgment / emotion opposition ( " [ r ] eality is known in judg- ment , not in emotion " ) is simplistic and misleading . Sometimes an emo- tional response can impede one's reaching a sound judgment ; sometimes , however , an ...
Pagina 95
... Finnis does not , that " deliberately contracepted " sex can do much more “ than provide each partner with an individual gratifica- tion " -as can homosexual sexual conduct . If , contra Finnis , " deliberately contracepted " sex is not ...
... Finnis does not , that " deliberately contracepted " sex can do much more “ than provide each partner with an individual gratifica- tion " -as can homosexual sexual conduct . If , contra Finnis , " deliberately contracepted " sex is not ...
Cuprins
Introduction Religion in Politics | 3 |
One The Constitutional Law of Religious Freedom | 9 |
Free Exercise Nonestablishment and the Problem | 25 |
Drept de autor | |
4 alte secțiuni nu sunt arătate
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives Michael J. Perry Previzualizare limitată - 1997 |
Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives Michael J. Perry Previzualizare limitată - 1999 |
Termeni și expresii frecvente
abortion accommodation position American arguments in public based moral arguments Catholic chapter Chicago L Christian Church citizens claim coercive political choice conduct is immoral constitutional law constitutionally controversial Court David Tracy deliberately contracepted discourse Establishment Clause exercise of religion Finnis Finnis's Fourteenth Amendment free exercise norm freedom of religion fundamental gious heterosexual homosexual sexual conduct human conduct Human Rights human well-being ideal of public John Finnis John Rawls Kent Greenawalt legislators liberal democracy lifelong marriage ment monogamous morality of human nonestablishment norm norm forbids government Perry persons persuasive secular argument plausible secular rationale premises presenting religious arguments principle proper role public officials public political debate public reason question Rawls Rawls's relationship of faithful relevant religion in politics religion or belief religious believers religious practice religiously based moral rely requirements of human role of religion Ronald Dworkin sacred supports the choice tion underdeterminacy United violate the nonestablishment