Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives
In this book, Michael Perry addresses several fundamental questions about the proper role of religion in the politics of a liberal democracy, which is a central, recurring issue in the politics of the United States. The controversy about religion in politics comprises both constitutional and moral questions. According to the constitutional law of the United States, government may not "establish" religion. Given this "nonestablishment" requirement, what role (if any) is it constitutionally permissible for religion to play in the politics of the United States? Does a legislator or other public official, or even an ordinary citizen, violate the nonestablishment requirement by presenting a religious argument in public debate about what political choice to make? Not every liberal democracy is constitutionally committed to an ideal of nonestablishment. Even in the absence of such a constitutional requirement, however, fundamental political-moral questions remain. Is it morally appropriate for citizens - in particular, legislators and other public officials - to present religious arguments about the morality of human conduct in public political debate? Is it morally appropriate for them to rely on such arguments in making a political choice? In addressing these and other questions, Perry criticizes recent work by Kent Greenawalt, John Rawls, and John Finnis.
Ce spun oamenii - Scrieți o recenzie
Nu am găsit nicio recenzie în locurile obișnuite.
Introduction Religion in Politics
One The Constitutional Law of Religious Freedom
Two Religious Arguments in Public Political Debate
Drept de autor
3 alte secțiuni nu sunt arătate
Alte ediții - Afișați-le pe toate
abortion accept accommodation According action activity acts Amendment American argu basis belief Catholic chapter Christian Church citizens claim conception conclusion conscience constitutional controversial course Court culture discourse discriminate discussion engage equal establish example explained faith Finnis forbids free exercise free exercise norm freedom fundamental Greenawalt ground homosexual sexual conduct human conduct Human Rights human well-being ideal important issue John justice least legislators less liberal marriage matter mean ment morality of human nature nonestablishment norm officials particular persons persuasive political choice position premises present principle prohibit proper protect public political debate public reason question rationale Rawls reality relationship relevant religion religious argument religious believers religious practice rely requirements of human respect role sacred schools secular argument seems sense social society suggest supports things tion tradition truth understanding United University violate