Animals and Ethics: An Overview of the Philosophical Debate
Broadview Press, 12 mai 2003 - 214 pagini
To what extent can animals be regarded as part of the moral community? To what extent, if at all, do they have moral rights? Are we wrong to eat them or to hunt them? Is the use of animals for scientific research justified? And can the ideas behind animal liberation be squared with those of the environmental movement? It is Taylor's strong belief that, whatever our own views on these contentious issues may be, we benefit by exploring them more thoroughly, and by understanding and evaluating arguments of those who may disagree with us. He traces the background of these debates from Aristotle to Darwin, and he provides fair-minded commentaries on the positions of contemporary philosophers Peter Singer, Tom Regan, Nel Noddings, Mary Anne Warren, J. Baird Callicott, and numerous others, with ethical theories ranging from utilitarianism to eco-feminism. A precious edition of this book appeared under the title
Ce spun oamenii - Scrieți o recenzie
Nu am găsit nicio recenzie în locurile obișnuite.
acceptable According animal liberation animal rights argues argument basic basis behaviour believe benefits calls capacity Chapter claim concept concern conscious consider consideration creatures death debate Descartes desire duties eating engineering environment equal ethic example existence experience experimentation fact feel feminist genetic give harm Hence human hunters hunting idea important individuals inherent value interests intrinsic involves issue justified killing lack least less liberationists lives maintains mals matter means meat ment moral agents moral community moral rights moral status movement nature necessary non-human normal obligations organisms pain particular person philosophers pleasure position possess possible principle protection question rational reason recognize Regan rejects relations require respect response result rights view says sense sentient significant simply Singer social society sort species suffering things traditional treat treatment understand utilitarian vegetarianism wild animals wrong