Imagini ale paginilor
PDF
ePub

INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. See also Constitutional Law, III, 1;
Gas, 2.

Authority of agency-Securities & Exchange Commission-Public
Utility Act.-Order denying parity treatment to stock acquired by
management while plan of reorganization was before Commission,
sustained as adequately based; function and scope of judicial review.
S. E. C. v. Chenery Corp., 194.

ADMIRALTY.

Maritime torts-Jurisdiction of state court-Liability-General
agency contract.-Jurisdiction of state court of suit for maritime tort;
operators under general agency contract of vessel owned by United
States not deemed owners pro hac vice; stevedore injured by defective
boom without remedy in New York court against agents. Caldarola
v. Eckert, 155.

AGENTS. See Admiralty; Estoppel.

AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ACT. See Interest.

AGRICULTURE. See Constitutional Law, XI, 2; XII, 2; Insur-
ance; Interest.

ALIEN FRIEND. See Constitutional Law, VII; War.

ALIEN LAND LAW. See Constitutional Law, XI, 2; XII, 2.
ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. See Constitutional Law, VII;
War.

ALIENS. See also Constitutional Law, VII; XI, 2; XII, 2; War.

Deportation "Entry.”—Return of resident alien seaman to United
States from foreign port, after torpedoing of ship on intercoastal
voyage, was not "entry" within meaning of provision for deportation
for crime committed within five years. Delgadillo v. Carmichael,
388.

ALLOCATION OF MARKETS. See Antitrust Acts, 4.

AMBIGUITY. See Constitutional Law, X, 1.

ANTITRUST ACTS. See also Procedure, 3.

1. Sherman Act-Sufficiency of complaint-Taxicabs.-Allegations
of combination, and conspiracy to restrain and monopolize sale of
taxicabs to principal operating companies in four major cities charged
violation of Act. U. S. v. Yellow Cab Co., 218.

ANTITRUST ACTS-Continued.

2. Id. Allegations of conspiracy not to compete for contracts with
railroads to transport passengers and luggage between Chicago sta-
tions, charged violation of Act. Id.

3. Id.-Service rendered by local taxicabs in conveying interstate
passengers between homes and railroad stations was not interstate
commerce; combination or conspiracy to restrain or monopolize such
service violative of Act. Id.

4. Sherman Act-Violations-Remedy.-Restraint of trade and
commerce in titanium products through pooling of patents and alloca-
tion of markets; injunction; terms of decree. U. S. v. National Lead
Co., 319.

5. Violations-Patented machines-Restrictive leases.-Provision of
leases of patented machines requiring exclusive use therein of lessor's
unpatented salt products, unlawful. International Salt Co. v. U. S.,
392.

6. Id.-Injunction properly included requirement that patented
salt machines be leased, sold or licensed on non-discriminatory terms
and conditions.

Id.

APPEAL. See Habeas Corpus; Jurisdiction, I, 2; II, 2; Proce-
dure, 5.

ARMED FORCES. See Criminal Law, 1; Jurisdiction, I, 3; Negli-
gence.

ARREST. See Constitutional Law, V; Criminal Law, 4.

ASSAULT. See Employers' Liability Act, 1.

ASSESSMENT. See Taxation, 1.

ATTORNEY GENERAL. See also Stipulations.

Powers-Legal proceedings-Interests of United States.-Power-of
Attorney General to institute proceedings in Supreme Court against
California to determine rights of United States in 3-mile belt off
coast. U. S. v. California, 19.

ATTORNEYS. See Constitutional Law, VI; X, 9-11.

AUTOMOBILES. See Constitutional Law, V; Criminal Law, 4.
BAGGAGE. See Antitrust Acts, 2.

BANDS. See Taxation, 2.

BANKS. See Constitutional Law, I; III, 1; X, 4.

BILL OF RIGHTS. See Constitutional Law, IV; V; VI; VII; X,
1-4, 7, 11, 14.

BLUE RIBBON JURY. See Constitutional Law, X, 12; XI, 4.

BONDS. See also Set-Off.

Payment bonds-Laborers and materialmen-Sureties.-Rights
as between surety and Government under payment bond. U. S. v.
Munsey Trust Co., 234.

BROADCASTING. See Constitutional Law, III, 2; IV; X, 1-2;
XIII.

BURDEN OF PROOF. See Employers' Liability Act, 2.

CABS. See Antitrust Acts, 1-3.

CALIFORNIA. See Attorney General; Constitutional Law, II;
X, 7; XI, 2; XII, 2; Decree; Estoppel; Jurisdiction, I, 1; II,
1; Stipulations.

CARRIERS, See Antitrust Acts, 2-3; Constitutional Law, VIII,
2-6; IX; Employers' Liability Act; Labor, 1, 3.

CASE OR CONTROVERSY. See Jurisdiction, I, 1; II, 1.

CEILING PRICE. See Criminal Law, 2.

CERTIORARI. See Jurisdiction, II, 5.

CHARTER. See Constitutional Law, IX.

-CHICAGO. See Antitrust Acts, 2.

CHILDREN. See Constitutional Law, XI, 2; XII, 2.

CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. See Jurisdiction, III; Proce-
dure, 5.

CITIZENS. See Constitutional Law, XI, 2; XII, 2.

CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES. See Jurisdiction, III; Procedure,
3, 5.

CIVIL RIGHTS. See Constitutional Law, XI, 2; XII, 2.

CLASSIFICATION. See Constitutional Law, X, 2-3; XI; Orimi-
nal Law, 1.

CLAYTON ACT. See Antitrust Acts, 5–6.

COAST. See Attorney General; Constitutional Law, II.

COERCION. See Constitutional Law, III, 2; IV; X, 1-2, 6, 8.

COLLECTION. See Taxation, 1.

COLLEGES. See Constitutional Law, XI, 1.

COMBINATIONS. See Antitrust Acts, 1-4.

COMMERCE. See Antitrust Acts; Constitutional Law, VIII Bm-

ployers' Liability Act; Food and Drugs; Gas; Labor.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. See Taxation.

COMMUNICATIONS ACT. See Constitutional Law, III, 2; IV;
X, 1-2; XIII.

COMPENSATION. See Constitutional Law, VII.

COMPETITION. See Antitrust Acts.

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT. See Employers' Liability
Act, 2.

CONFESSION. See Constitutional Law, X, 6-8; Jurisdiction,
II, 6.

CONFESSION OF ERROR. See Constitutional Law, X, 5.

CONSERVATORS. See Constitutional Law, I; III, 1; X, 4.
CONSPIRACY. See Antitrust Acts, 1–4; Criminal Law, 2–3.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. See also Jurisdiction, I, 1; II, 1.
I. In General, p. 862.

II. Federal-State Relations, p. 862.
III. Legislative Power, p. 862.
IV. Freedom of Speech, p. 863.
V. Search and Seizure, p. 863.
VI. Right to Counsel, p. 863.
VII. Eminent Domain, p. 863.
VIII. Commerce, p. 863.

IX. Contracts, p. 864.

X. Due Process of Law, p. 864.

XI. Equal Protection of Laws, p. 865.
XII. Privileges and Immunities, p. 866.

XIII. Slavery and Involuntary Servitude, p. 866.

I. In General.

Constitutionality of statute-Who may challenge.-Association or-
ganized and operating under Home Owners' Loan Act may not
challenge validity of provision for appointment of conservators.
Fahey v. Mallonee, 245.

II. Federal-State Relations.

Off-coast areas-Relative rights.-Federal Government's rights par-
amount to California's in 3-mile belt off coast. U. S. v. California,
19, 804.

III. Legislative Power.

1. Legislative power-Delegation-Home Owners' Loan Act.-Au-
thority to Board to prescribe terms and conditions of appointment
of conservators for federal savings and loan associations, not uncon-
stitutional delegation of legislative power. Fahey v. Mallonee, 245.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued.

2. Federal legislation-Radio broadcasting-Criminal offenses.—
Provision of Communications Act penalizing coercion of broadcasting
station to employ more than "number of employees needed,” valid.
U. S. v. Petrillo, 1.

IV. Freedom of Speech.

Federal legislation-Communications Act-Picketing.-Act forbid-
ding coercion of broadcasting station to employ more employees than
needed did not, on its face, deny freedom of speech. U. S. v. Pe-
trillo, 1.

V. Search and Seizure.

Unreasonable search-Without warrant-Automobile passenger.—
Search of automobile passenger without warrant as unreasonable
and unlawful; search unjustified as incident to arrest or as incident
to search of vehicle; validity of search not determinable by what
it reveals; unreasonable search not justifiable as aid to law enforce-
ment; conviction in federal court on evidence obtained by unlawful
search invalid. U. S. v. Di Re, 581.

VI. Right to Counsel. (See also X, 9-11.)

Sixth Amendment-Waiver-Sufficiency.-Waiver of right to coun-
sel in prosecution for violation of Espionage Act insufficient if
defendant relied on erroneous legal advice of FBI agent. Von Moltke
v. Gillies, 708.

VII. Eminent Domain.

Taking of property-Just compensation--Aliens.-Right of alien
friend to just compensation for property taken by United States.
Silesian-American Corp. v. Clark, 469.

VIII. Commerce.

1. Federal regulation - Food and drugs - Misbranding-Retail
sale. Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, construed as forbidding retail
sale without adequate directions and warning of drug theretofore
shipped properly labeled in interstate commerce to wholesaler, valid.
U. S. v. Sullivan, 689.

2. State taxation-Motor carriers.-Montana taxes on motor car-
riers for each vehicle operated on state's highways, valid though
carrier engaged exclusively in interstate commerce. Aero Transit
Co. v. Board of Comm'rs, 495.

3. Id.-Fact that proceeds are subject to appropriation for general
state purposes does not invalidate taxes. Id.

4. Id.--Immaterial that State imposes two taxes rather than one,
or that taxpayer pays other taxes devoted to highway maintenance.

« ÎnapoiContinuă »