Roger, K. of Sicily, ii. 230. 513. Rollin, i. 177. Romanus, i. 197. Rousseau, ii. 487. Rubruquis, ii. 259. S Sacred Literature, i. 382. ii. 55. 83. Sale, i. 2. 6. 19-21. 25. 57. 67. 76. 284. 286-288. 306. 326. Scaliger, i. 44. Schleusner, i. 244. Schultetus, ii. 489. 492. Tacitus, i. 94. 135. Tamerlane, i. 19. 205. ii. 463. Titus, i. 135. ii. 392. Togrul Bey, i. 197. 221. ii. 493. Selden, i. 324, 325. 397. ii. 407. Toukush, i. 199. 451, 452. 496. 503. 517. Shaheda, ii. 347. Shakespear, ii. 516. Shakspeare, ii. 323. Shahrestani, ii. 406. 472. 476. 126. 143, 144. ii. 413. 421, 423. Sobieski, i. 86. ii. 483. Socinus, ii. 499. Socrates, ii. 285. 289. Townson, ii. 425. 465. Turner, i. 48. 50-53. 73. 79. 85, V Van Waenen, i. 342. Vasari, ii. 504. Ubertus Folieta, ii. 484. Vertot, i. 81. 376. ii. 402. Soliman, i. 201. 203. 237. ii. 501, Vespasian, ii. 396. 502. Sophronius, ii. 436. Villers, ii. 450. 504, 505, 506, 507, 508. 510, 511. 522. Published by the same Author. DISCOURSES principally on Subjects of Scripture History. Price 10s. 6d. in boards. CRITICAL ESSAYS on Genesis, Chap. XX., and on St. Matthew, Chap. II. 17, 18. with Notes. Price 4s. in boards. MAHOMETANISM UNVEILED. INTRODUCTION. THE success of Mahometanism has been fairly stated, as the only event in the history of the human species, which admits of comparison with the propagation of Christianity. This con sideration is sufficient to account for the interest with which the religion of Mahomet has been surveyed, and continues to be surveyed, by men of reading and reflection: especially when the fact of its exclusiveness is taken in connection with the intrinsic force of the comparison between the two creeds. Beginning alike in silence and obscurity, they have advanced to a dominion equally unknown in any other age or institution t: while the general features of their * Paley. For the course run by Mahometanism, see Hottinger, Historia Orientalis, p. 274. and pp.279, 280. edit. 1651; White, Bampton Lectures, edit. Dublin, 1785; Oelsner, Effets de la Religion de Mohammed, chapitre iii. B history present resemblances and agreements abundantly in character with this fundamental coincidence, to fix universal attention on the parallel. The importance of the subject may be fairly measured, by the degree in which it has exercised the conflicting zeal of the enemies and friends of our holy faith. In the estimation of the unbeliever, this parallel is still seen to furnish his most specious ground of attack; in that of the Christian advocate, it opens an arduous and anxious field for the defence of Revelation; while, by competent minds, neither deficient in sound learning and philosophy, nor wanting in genuine attachment to the great truths of Christianity, the question is, to this day, regarded as unsettled, and the causes which induced the success of Mahometanism pronounced an unsolved problem.* Where the subject involves the best interests of mankind, this is obviously a state of the question in which the human mind will hardly consent to rest. Inquiry must, and eventually will, proceed. But the success of inquiry will inevit 1 Throughout this work, the figures refer to the Notes at the end. * See Sale's Koran, Advertisement to Reader, pp. iii, iv. ; Retrospective Review, vol. iii. article, Sale's Koran; and Philosophy of Modern History, vol. i. pp. 235, 236. "A full explanation of the causes which contributed to the progress of Mohammedanism is not, perhaps, at present attainable, by those most conversant with this department of literature.”. History of the Middle Ages, vol. ii. p. 163. |