Imagini ale paginilor
PDF
ePub

maxillipede (fig. 10), but here it is more striking,

and considerably modifies the general appearance of the appendage. The exopodite (ex.) is well developed, especially at its base; the endopodite (en.) is small and consists of only two joints; in the prodopodite (pr.) the two component segments da

[blocks in formation]

en

-ep

FIG. 10.-Astacus fluviatilis. First left maxillipede (1,5/1): co, coxopodine, and ba, basipodite, forming pr, protopodite; en, endopodite; ex, exopodite; ep, epipodite (Huxley).

are

transformed into
two long thin plates,
and the podobranch
is replaced by a mem-
braneous plate (the
epipodite) (ep.). Behind
the maxillipedes are
the claws and the four
walking legs. In these
five pairs of appen-
dages the
the exopodite
shows most signs of
degeneration. We will
now examine the com-

ponent parts of these
appendages (fig. 11).

The protopodite (pr.) consists of two parts (ba. and co.), and carries a gill (br.) except in the last walking

leg. The endopodite consists of five primitive joints, which are well developed and form the ordinary claw; these five parts are the ischiopodite (is.), the mesopodite (me.), the carpopodite (ca.), the propodite (pr.), and the dactylopodite (da.). The exopodite is missing. No vestige or rudiment of it is to be found in any phase of the development of the crayfish. In the lobster, however, which is closely allied to the cray-fish, the exopodite is still to be found during the larval period. The third fundamental part of the primitive member persists also in prawns throughout the entire period of life, but the organ is very small. At the extremity of the first and second pairs of walking legs there is an apparatus consisting of a fixed part—an elongation of the protopodite—and of a moveable part—the dactylopodite. This furnishes the walking leg with a prehensile organ which is well developed in the first pair of walking legs, and which is enormously increased in the true claws. In this evolution degeneration is exhibited by the disappearance of a joint, for in these appendages the basipodite and the ischiopodite are immovably united. This morphological degeneration corresponds to a functional change in the appendage. So long as the claw was used for locomotion a joint at this point was indispensable for progression. It is this joint which, in six or eight-footed beasts allows of the horizontal motion of the member necessary for locomotion, which in six-footed beasts results from the general

structure of the parts and their auricular combinaOn the claw becoming prehensile, the joint

tions.

hinge consolidates, the lever thus becoming much stronger and permitting the claw to be used to greater advantage.1

It now remains to examine the appendages situated in front of the maxillipedes, i.e. the appendages of the head. In the second maxilla (fig. 12) a special transformation may be observed. The coxopodite

pr

ba

en

SC

FIG. 12. -Astacus fluviatilis. Second left maxila (1,5/1): co, coxopodite, and ba, basipodite, forming pr, protopodite; en, endopodire; sc, scaphog. nathide (Huxley).

(co.), and the basipodite (ba.), are flat plates; the endopodite (en.), which is small and undivided, exhibits signs of degeneration in its

en

size, and in the absence of all articulations. The exopodite, according to some authorities on the FIG. 13.-Astacus Ruvia subject, no longer exists, while illa (1,5/1): co, coxo- according to others it constitutes

tilis. First left max

podite, and ba, basi

protopodite; en, en

podite, forming pr, Wwith the epipodite (the analogous dopodite (Huxley). part to that which we regard as representing the gill in the maxillipede), a large peculiarly-shaped blade, the scaphognathide (sc.).

In the first maxilla (fig. 13), a partial degeneration of the organ is very marked: the exopodite and 1 See J. Demoor, Recherches sur la Marche des Crustacés (Arch. de Zool. exp. et gen., 2o serie, t. iv., 1891).

T. List, Bewegungsapparat des Arthropoden, 1. Theil, Astacus Fluviatilis. Morphol. Jahrbuch., xxii. Bd. 3. Heft, 1895.

the epipodite are missing; the endopodite is reduced to a mere unjointed stem, and only the protopodite retains its two normal component parts.

The mandibles (fig. 14), the appendages of the fourth segment, are modified entirely for mastication. They consist of a strong transverse piece (pr.) provided at the extremity with an inner surface (st.) for grinding and sawing, and of a three-jointed piece (en.) with bristles which point outwards. The first piece is the result of the

[blocks in formation]

modification of the two parts of the protopodite, which have united to form the organ of mastication; the second, which represents the endopodite, is the feeler, an organ of sensation. All the other parts of the appendage have disappeared.

The antenna (fig. 15), which is a tectile apparatus, is formed of two parts representing the segments of the protopodite (pr.). The long-ringed process is the endopodite, while the lateral scale of the antenna represents a much reduced exopodite (ex.).

The antennule (fig. 16) consists of a protopodite (pr.), furnished with an annulated endopodite (en.) and exopodite (ex.).

The eye-stalk (fig. 17) consists of a two-jointed protopodite (pr.). This is all that remains, the

endopodite and the exopodite being

absent altogether.

pr

This examination of the appen- FIG. 17.-Astacus furia

dages of the cray-fish clearly shows that all fresh adaptation in the appendage entails the modification

tilis.

Left eye-stalk (1,5/1): pr, protopodito (Huxley).

of some parts

and the degeneration of others. In each case evolution is accompanied by degeneration.

§ 3. Transformation of homologous organs in individuals of different species.

The limitations of our present knowledge make it difficult to determine definitely the origin of limbs among vertebrates, but they are universally supposed to have developed from the lateral folds which still persist in Amphioxus, and which probably existed in the ancestors of vertebrates.1

'A. Morphological proofs:

(a) Lateral folds of amphioxus.

(b) Identity of the skeletons of paired and unpaired fins.
(c) The number of spinal nerves passing to the fins.
(d) The mode of entrance of these nerves into the fins.

B. Embryological proofs:

(a) Continuous lateral folds in the embryoes of fish.
(b) The formation of metameric pouches (coelomic in-
vaginations not only at the point of origin of the
limbs, but between them).

« ÎnapoiContinuă »