Federal Records Pertaining to Brown V. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954)National Archives and Records Administration, 2004 - 34 pagini |
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Termeni și expresii frecvente
14th Amendment African American African American children Appellate Case Files Archives and Records Archives-Pacific Region San Archives-Southwest Region Board of Education Board of Prince Brown decision Circuit Court City County School Board Court of Appeals court's decision David Johnson denied admission desegregation District Case File District of Columbia Division Case File E-mail Eastern District Education of Topeka Francisco Unified School Girard College Gonzalo Mendez Harry Briggs injunction Kent County Laguna Niguel Leslie Taylor Lynchburg Melvin Sharpe Mobile County NARA National Archives Building National Archives-Northeast Region National Archives-Pacific Region National Archives-Southwest Northern District October Term 1954 Oliver Brown plaintiffs Plessy Presidential libraries Prince Edward County public schools R. W. Elliott race or color racial segregation Records Administration reference information paper Region San Francisco San Francisco Unified school desegregation school system separate but equal Shawnee County Spottswood Thomas Bolling Unified School District United States District United States Supreme violation Washington white schools
Pasaje populare
Pagina 8 - Negro admitted to a white graduate school be treated like all other students, again resorted to intangible considerations: "... his ability to study, to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students, and, in general, to learn his profession.
Pagina 12 - Davis et al. v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, Virginia, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, argued December 10, 1952, reargued December 7-8, 1953; and No.
Pagina 13 - ... tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? We believe that it does.
Pagina 8 - Here, petitioner's right was a personal one. It was as an individual that he was entitled to the equal protection of the laws, and the State was bound to furnish him within its borders facilities for legal education substantially equal to those which the State there afforded for persons of the white race, whether or not other negroes sought the same opportunity.
Pagina 18 - ... from and after such time as may be necessary to make arrangements for admission of children to such schools on a racially non-discriminatory basis with all deliberate speed, as required by the Supreme Court in Brown v.
Pagina 16 - ... race or color, any dependents of military personnel or civilian employees of the plaintiff in the operation of the public schools of Bossier Parish, together with such additional relief as may be appropriate.
Pagina 24 - Mr. Justice Douglas, Circuit Justice. Applicants are Americans of Chinese ancestry, who seek a stay of a Federal District Court's order reassigning pupils of Chinese ancestry to elementary public schools in San Francisco. The order was made in a school desegregation case, the San Francisco Unified School District having submitted a comprehensive plan for desegregation which the District Court approved. There are many minorities in the elementary schools of San Francisco; and while the opinion of...
Pagina 12 - Oliver Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka, Shawnee County, Kansas, et al.