...prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.'" Id., at 799-800, quoting from Irvin v. Dowd, 366 US 717, 723 (1961)....

...prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court. Spies v. Illinois, 123 US 131 ; Holt v. United States, 218 US 245;...

...prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court"* Every appeal of this kind, said die Court, being of mixed law and...

...prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented In court" " Mr. Justice Clark expanded briefly on this theme in the dissent...

...the allegations surrounding a prosecution, or even whether he may have some impression about them, but whether 'the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.* Irvin v. Powd, 366 US 717, 723 (1961). Compare Sheppard v. Maxwell,...

...the allegations surrounding a prosecution, or even whether he may have some impression about them, but whether "the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court." irvin v. Dowd, 366 US 717, 723 (1961). Compare Sheppard v. Maxwell,...

...prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court. [Citations omitted.] The Court went on to rule that the test was "whether...

...prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court. Irvin v. Dowd, ]9G1, 366 US 717. 722-723, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642. 6 L.Ed.2d...

...impartial, as that term was defined by this Court in cases such as Irvin v. Dowd ["It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court"]. He does not claim that pretrial publicity, ex parte communications,...

...145 (1878). that is necessary to ensure a fair trial, Justice Clark wrote, is that a juror be able to "lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court."12 In a 1991 decision, the Supreme Court held that trial judges need...