Federal Probation, Volumele 41-42Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 1977 |
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Termeni și expresii frecvente
Administration adult agencies American arrest assistance behavior Bureau of Prisons California capital punishment caseload Center clients Commission committed conviction Cook County counsel County crime criminal justice system Criminology David Fogel decision defendant Delinquency Director drug effective evaluation FEDERAL PROBATION goals gram Illinois imprisonment incarceration increase individual inmates involved issues judges juvenile Law Enforcement mandatory sentences marihuana ment methadone National offenders organization parole officer penology percent persons PH.D population present pretrial Probation and Parole probation officer probationer problems Professor punishment rates recidivism rectional reform rehabilitation release responsibility restitution result role School Section sentence sentencing laws social staff supervision supervisor tencing tion tional treatment U.S. District Court U.S. Parole Commission UDIS University victim victimology violation volunteer Washington York youth
Pasaje populare
Pagina 1 - Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
Pagina 49 - It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin...
Pagina 50 - Evidence of a test's validity should consist of empirical data demonstrating that the test Is predictive of or significantly correlated with Important elements of work behavior which comprise or are relevant to the job or jobs for which candidates are being evaluated.
Pagina 48 - the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.
Pagina 86 - I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves ; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education.
Pagina 32 - The General Assembly shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ; nor shall any person be compelled to attend any place of worship, pay tithes, taxes, or other rates for building or repairing places of worship, or the maintenance of any minister, or ministry.
Pagina 72 - We hold, therefore, that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person may be imprisoned for any offense, whether classified as petty, misdemeanor, or felony, unless he was represented by counsel at his trial.