 The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries shall, in accordance with their respective constitutional processes, defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality, and consequently shall have the right...  American Overseas Interests Act: Markup Before the Subcommittee on ... - Pagina 79de United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations. Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights - 1995 - 196 paginiVizualizare completă - Despre această carte
 | 1979 - 1198 pagini
...in mind. Thus tho Joint Declaration of October 14, 1977, affirms the right of the United States to "defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality," and to "have the right to act against any aggression or threat directed against the Canal or acrainst the... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations - 1977 - 1558 pagini
...by Americans and Panamanians as "ambiguous." The Statement included the following passages: first, that each of "the two countries shall, in accordance...Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality"; second, that the previous provision "does not mean, nor shall it be interpreted as a right of intervention... | |
 | United States. Department of State - 1977 - 24 pagini
...to defend the canal against any threat to the permanent regime of neutrality. They each, therefore, shall have the right to act against any aggression...or against the peaceful transit of vessels through it. The neutrality treaty further provides that US and Panamanian warships and auxiliary vessels shall... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1978 - 786 pagini
...United States to intervene in the internal affairs of Panama. But, the correct interpretation is that the two countries shall, in accordance with their...constitutional processes, defend the canal against any threat — any threat — to the regime of neutrality, and consequently shall have the right to act against... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1978 - 168 pagini
...As I read the language in the statement itself, it is eminently clear that each of the two countries shall have the right to act against any aggression or threat directed against the canal. It also says "Each of the two countries shall, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, defend... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1977 - 708 pagini
...States to "defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality," and to "have the rirt: to act against any aggression or threat directed against the Canal or against tie peaceful transit of vessels through the Canal." The Joint Statement then emphs sizes that the exercise... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1977 - 744 pagini
...defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality established therein and consequently to act against any aggression or threat directed against the Canal or peaceful transit. We believe that the 1977 treaties establish the basis for an arrangement with a fair... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1977 - 704 pagini
...the canal against any threat to its neutrality and consequently will have the right to act in case of aggression or threat directed against the canal or against the peaceful transit or ships through the canal. United States will be directed at insuring that the canal remains open,... | |
 | 1978 - 74 pagini
...will leuiain open <md secure to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries shall, in accordance...the peaceful transit of vessels through the canal. This does not mean, nor shall it be interpreted as a right of intervention of the United States in... | |
| |
