...September 30, 1980) (remarks of Rep. Florio). The general rule, however, is that a court or agency "apply the law in effect at the time it renders its...direction or legislative history to the contrary." Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 US 696, 711 (1974). Clearly there is no manifest injustice in...

...revised rules to a pending case. In Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, the Supreme Court noted that "a court is to apply the law in effect at the...so would result in manifest injustice or there is a statutory direction or legislative history to the contrary." 3 Thus, the Court's holding indicates...

...holding in this case on the principle that a court is to apply the law in effect at the time itrenders its decision, unless doing so would result in manifest...direction or legislative history to the contrary. The origin and the justification for this rul< are found in the words of Mr. Chief Justice Marshall...

...cases only where that is its clearly stated intention, holding instead that the new law must be applied "unless doing so would result in manifest injustice...direction or legislative history to the contrary." This rule is not new. Its origin can be traced back in American jurisprudence at least as far as Chief...

...on appeal, namely that "a court is to apply the law in effect at the time it renders its decisions, unless doing so would result in manifest injustice...direction or legislative history to the contrary." Cort v. Ash, 422 US 66, 76-77 (1975), quoting Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 US 696, 711 (1974)....

...for litigation that had been pending for several years when the relevant statute was enacted, because "a court is to apply the law in effect at the time...statutory direction or legislative history to the 179. Pub. L. No. 96-481, tit. II, § 202, 94 Stat. 2325 (1980). 180. 587 F.2d 75 (1st Cir. 1978). 181....

...review at the time that the change in law took effect, and relied on Schooner Peggy as the basis for the principle that "a court is to apply the law in...manifest injustice or there is statutory direction or 324 Legislative history to the contrary." 416 US at 711. See also Gulf Offshore Company v. Mobil Oil...

...Schooner Peggy as the basis for the principle that "a court is to apply the law in effect at the tine it renders its decision, unless doing so would result...direction or legislative history to the contrary." 416 US at 711. See also Gulf Offshore Company v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 453 US 473, 486 n.16 (1981)....

...the AAR-NITL-API agreement, with our modifications, are restated in Appendix C. An agency generally is to apply the law in effect at the time it renders...direction or legislative history to the contrary. See Zittrin, Inc. v. United States, 31B US 73,78 (1942); Bradley v. Rienmone Scnool Boa re , 416 US...

...US 696 (1974), the Court of Appeals observed that "[a] federal court or administrative agency must 'apply the law in effect at the time it renders its...direction or legislative history to the contrary.' " 724 F. 2d, at 36, quoting 416 US, at 711. We conclude, however, that reliance on such a presumption...